![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
And sizzling is good.
And sizzling is good.
Afaik water pressure is variable on each city’s design needs.
You become a billionaire with stocks. Which requires others to work 9 to 5s.
It’s too bad those voters never show up.
McDonalds is famously not a serving restaurant.
Speaking of strawmans (a weird one at that). And gaslighting. And wild. Projection in case you don’t get it.
Why am I bothering. Ciao.
It’s a bit simpler. Those facts, evidence, research, and experts? The religious right thinks that’s all based on faith and belief, because that’s how they work. That’s really what they think. It’s mind boggling but that’s what they think.
Bad arguments like portraying a bunch of idiots as an actual military force and a war? And you’re still (kinda) at it. Now a strawman. Yup, you’re everything you project about bad arguments. Ciao.
Well yeah this is the Trump strategy. Throw as much shit as you can to knock the other person around and they don’t have time to respond to it all.
The sitting president told… wait for it… A bunch of idiots. I get that you don’t like nuclear, but this is embarrassing.
That stick has staying power, a week at least.
Thinking through this: it will swamp Congress with every minor little detail, bringing progress to a standstill. There’s just too much stuff, that’s partly why agencies are set up.
AND Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, and Senate) to pass anything (any of these details). Dems have had that for only 4 of the last 24 years. The GOP gets to block any of this when they have a single one of those. If you thought there was a lack of progress before, it’s going to be tenfold going forward.
Why is it that the right thinks science and expertise is an opinion?
They work off belief and faith, that’s what religion is. So they project that everyone else thinks and works the same way - they think science is a belief and faith. It’s always projection.
Anyone needing a refresher:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test for when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency’s interpretation of a law or statute.
Oh the military did Jan 6? Must have missed that. You know the tanks rolling toward Congress.
A bunch of idiots is not a war with tanks, artillery, and planes.
Gotta protect those profit margins!
Would meteorologists be writing that stuff or just using it? I would have thought using, but not programming.
I thought we decided FAANGM was better as FAGMAN.