• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    If five people can maintain a service bigger than all those combined, then the big streamers need to buck their fucking ideas up.

  • paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The group used “sophisticated computer scripts” and software to scour piracy services (including the Pirate Bay and Torrentz) for illegal copies of TV episodes, which they then downloaded and hosted on Jetflicks’ servers, according to federal prosecutors.

    They probably used Sonarr and Radarr and called it a day (or similar off-the-shelf tools available on GitHub). It’s not very sophisticated at all. That combined with Jellyfin and a VPN (or Usenet or a country that doesn’t care about piracy) and you have your own up and running. You could also just use free sites with an ad blocker instead of paying $10/mo like the service this article is about charged.

    Unrelated to all of this: https://rentry.co/megathread

  • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    All the comments in here are so damn tedious. Copyright is a mess, but holy shit, people tie themselves in knots to make excuses for pirates being careless and stupid

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    They’re here doing everyone a service. Why are there resources to prosecute this but not like elon musk’s insider trading?

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The only thing I’m pisseed about is the fact that I was unaware of its existence. Fuck the system

  • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Honestly pretty funny to call the site “Jetflix” and advertise it as nothing but aviation videos. Nobody would know what you’re up to until they pay you.

    How much you wanna bet a aerospace nut subscribed to this because they love Jets, and immediately reported this site to the authorities because he got the avengers movies rather than Airbus maintenance videos or something…

    Pretty stupid though to run this site out of the USA. Terrible opsec. They really just seemed to trust that nobody who cares would ever figure out what they were doing. Plenty of similar sites out there that don’t even need to hide what they are because they are well outside of American jurisdiction.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Five men convicted by the court of the high seas for being absolute chads

  • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is despicable. What specific service was this? So I know how to avoid it if it should resurface.

    • rmuk@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      ITT: Have you heard the good news about our lord and saviour, Jellyfin?

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Plex is a privacy nightmare that’s slowly trying to faze out you having a server all together in favor of feeding you commercialized content from other providers; and many people find Jellyfin is far too unpolished/disorganized for a lot of debatable reasons I won’t go into.

        I’ve been quite happy with the middle ground: Emby. It’s not FOSS, but is well polished with consistent development, great feature parity across platforms, excellent clients for pretty much every device I’d want to use, and a helpful community ready to assist with any problems you come across. They also have a heavy focus on privacy; with no third party partners collecting your info like Plex, and no telemetry sent from servers/clients.

        The lifetime premier license I bought 7 years ago was well worth it.

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Yes. Emby was originally open source, but people would regularly fork it to remove the licensing. When they chose to go closed source; jellyfin forked that final release and has built from there.

            Emby has a premier licencing system to support their development, instead of selling user data and making deals with content providers like Plex, or depending on OSS development/contributions like Jellyfin.

            As far as I understand almost 80% of jellyfins current code is the original Emby code (called ‘media browser’ or ‘MB’ at the time), though to be fair, I haven’t verified that claim.

      • MSids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I always wonder why some people are so dedicated to Jellyfin. Even if JF had full feature and experience parity, it would still not have secure remote access the way Plex does. There is no need to port forward or NAT Plex for external access. With the threat landscape the way it is today, that is worth a lot.

        • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          I haven’t used Plex in a while, but I’m confused how Plex handles WAN connections without using any port forwarding? how is that possible?

          • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Both the client and server connect to plex.tv which then brokers the connection between them. They essentially work as a very limited vpn between your clients and server.

            This also gives them unrestricted access to the entirety of data passed between devices; and the ability to request any and all info from your server to be handed to whoever they chose.

            This is also how they allow you to ‘share’ content/libraries with each others servers; through their public infrastructure that’s collecting your information. Information they then sell to third parties to support their development and broker content agreements.

          • MSids@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            I have not looked into it for a while but I believe their servers broker a direct connection between the client and server.

          • Scrollone@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            I think there’s a misconception.

            Plex can “hide” (not really) your own server because you can direct your users on Plex.tv (they can login there, etc. without ever typing your IP address).

            But Plex can also use an internal reverse proxy that lets you see your content from outside even without port forwarding. However, quality and speed will be decreased.

            I think Jellyfin should work to ease the process of setting up your server as much as they can, but unless they start managing a SaaS like Plex does, they’ll never be able to offer the same simplicity for the end user.

            • AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              personally, I wouldn’t want my files going through plexs servers, especially with how shit I’ve heard they are with their privacy policy. that’s a really interesting concept tho, and makes a lot of sense. I doubt jellyfin will ever do that simply because they don’t have the resources to host that as you said.

              thanks for the explanation tho! greatly appreciated

              • MSids@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 days ago

                Plex, as a company, definitely is aware of what items are in your library but streams don’t go through the Plex servers unless you use the Plex proxy service which is enabled by default but only used when the client connection speed is too slow to use the desired streaming setting.

                Everyone who accesses their Plex externally should use app.plex.tv rather than NAT/port forwarding unless you’re also doing IP whitelisting on the NAT (not feasible for most remote access scenarios, as IPs are dynamic in most cases). Jellyfin should never be exposed externally.

                I work in a highly regulated sector of IT and have learned that even the most robust software will have serious exploits at some point.

      • linearchaos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m trying to switch to Jellyfin I really am. With Plex I could just throw a file bot at my files normalize the names and it was fine. I can’t mark things watched or unwatched from the Roku client. I’ve now tried three separate times to get the Doctor who specials to show up with names. Plex is by no means perfect but it’s so much easier to keep Plex goomed

        • stellargmite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I was fretting over Doctor Specials, season numbers, eras and naming a few weeks back. In fairness it has been running since black and white times so not too bad considering. Whats a filebot by the way and whats a good one?

          • linearchaos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Filebot a piece of software, it looks up your files on TMDB and themoviedb and renamese your files based on those lookups. Plex takes that naming very very well. We really need jellyfin to work with it too.

      • Jayb151@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Jellyfin is a bitch to get working outside my network. I don’t get how Plex made it so easy

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        You know, I’ve heard this gospel before, I might still have the pamphlet…

        Honestly, I haven’t really looked into jellyfin yet. I hear it’s superior in some way… But I already have Plex all set up and I have 4 friends with servers and we all share content. So it would take a lot for me to switch.

        • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 days ago

          It really isn’t superior. It’s just the hivemind that gets annoyed with Plex being stagnant, not open source etc. that claims it is. At best it has feature parity for some use-cases. Don’t get me wrong, it’s neat, but it’s not as polished as Plex.