What’s your favourite to use? Mine is Fish due to its ease of use and user friendly approach.

Bash is the pepperoni of shell tools being reliable in every field no matter what but I’ve moved to Fish as I wanted to try something different.

So what’s your shell of choice?

  • lengau@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Bash

    Not because it’s the best or even my favourite. Just because I create so many ephemeral VMs and containers that code switching isn’t worth it for me.

    • Technus@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Seconded. Having an awesome Fish setup doesn’t help at all when you’re constantly having to shell into other machines unless you somehow keep your dotfiles synced, and that sounds like a total hassle.

      I’d rather my muscle memory be optimized for the standard setup.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      Exactly, I choose the one that’s always there on every machine I access!

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I don’t really rate zsh personally. I find the additional features/syntactic sugar it adds are a poor tradeoff for lower portability. I also end up changing the settings in my zshrc to make it behave more like bash.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I really like fish because it has excellent contextual autocomplete based on the folder you’re in. I haven’t used any other shell that was as good at it.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I have been enjoying fish a lot over the last few months, but I generally try to use Bash, it makes cross-*NIX administration that much easier.

  • MXX53@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    My job is working with a ton of servers over ssh. Bash is the most convenient balance between features and not needing to do any setup.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    OpenBSD’s default public domain kornshell fork on OpenBSD, oksh (portable OpenBSD ksh clone) on Linux/MacOS/Other Unix. It has far fewer extensions than something like Bash (which I consider a positive) while being much faster (tested with hyperfine), and the extensions it does have are all useful (arrays, coprocesses, select, .* not expanding to . or .., pattern blocks, suspending of the whole shell).

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Bash is fine. Zsh on Macs is fine too. I can’t stress how useful it is to learn busybox if you end up with a shell on an embedded device.

    All these crazy shells people talk about are kinda like race car controls. I’m not driving a race car, I’m driving a box truck with three on the tree.

  • thepiguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Fish shell. I switched to fish ages ago, back when I didn’t know much bash scripting. Now I am just so used to it that I don’t wanna switch back. Plus it just works.

    • erwan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      Don’t try zsh, because you won’t be able to go back to bash after that 😉