• mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    rich bastards claiming that windmills would harm them through visual pollution.

    you fucking fuckwits, smog is visual pollution. But they don’t care.

    • fatalError@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Windmills are a whole lot better than burning coal, but aren’t perfect. Recyling the blades after their 20 year lifespan is a nightmare.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      you fucking fuckwits, smog is visual pollution.

      I’m old enough to remember people losing their shit at China over the 2008 Beijing Olympics drowning in a toxic cloud. The international outcry was such that the state spent a decade cleaning all that shit up (which produced its own wave of “Has Chinese Eco-fascism Gone Woke?!” screamer articles in turn).

      But their rate of pollution has been falling steadily for the last two decades, in no small part because the state wasn’t fighting an uphill battle against corporate slobs in white doctor’s coats trying to tell everyone that smog wasn’t happening/was good aktuly.

      Meanwhile, US expenditures on lobbying, denialism, and greenwashing stretch into the billions of dollars annually. And its not hard to understand why, when the ROI is $7T/year on the international stage.