• telllos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Well, you’re going to give the army some ideas, they will start giving their books to schools.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Well, a training manual is never a bad thing to have. And reading anything will help students become better and smarter.

  • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Cross posting my post the last time this was posted elsewhere, asking “Why Do They Need This?” The Police Problem sublemmy post

    Police don’t but they often want a vehicle for SWAT related reasons, but SWAT trucks costs hundreds of thousands. Meanwhile MRAPs are “free”.

    Prosper, Texas is home to 40,000 people. In 2010 their population was under 10k. They have quadrupled in size and are near the DFW area, so it’s not really a surprise they took the 1033 offer for an MRAP. That said most of these decom’d heaps of shit are loathesomely expensive. “High Cost of Free MRAPs” by Strongtowns. Most MRAPs being given out are first and second gen versions. And for those first gens, they got sent to the front lines of the GWOT and got beat to shit while newer ones were tested and approved. These old models they’re “giving out for free” have tire drum parts never used on later versions, transmissions like that of an F650 with half the reliability, and are ticking time bombs of use. Most cities often estimate maintenance costs at $5k per year, until something actually breaks and they have to get a second MRAP to cannibalize to fix the first. (Hint - that’s why you often see them picked up in pairs or more)

    That’s before the optics. Petaluma, California has one and the police chief has even said “yeah it kinda has some bad optics sending police around in a former war machine”.

    If your city is wanting to pick one up, it’s because someone who has zero experience with them really likes the idea of a big scary diesel monster rolling up on drug houses, and hasn’t actually considered that if they can’t pony up thousands of tax dollars every 6 months to keep the moneymonster fed, the only place it’s gonna drive is into a storage shed.

    Edit: I should add that these vehicles are incredibly versatile and aren’t necessarily a bad thing for municipalities. With their ride height, sheer bulk, and high torque engines, Fire and rescue could probably make great use them in several cities. They make fantastic road clearing vehicles in the event of large accidents needing to move to the side of the road, or pushing debris out of the way. Additionally in flood prone areas they make very good rescue vehicles due to their ride height and “crew space” inside. They DO have value outside of terrorizing civilian populations, just that that’s all PDs will use them for.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Nah, this is lemmy, dude. No one here is going to read that logical reason why this happened and change their minds.

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        their post is right in line with how lemmy thinks about these though. The whole thing is about how stupid they are in terms of costs, how the people who get them like it because they look tough, and provides statements from a police chief about how it makes them look bad. The edit discussing some of the possible usefulness of them, are things you never see these being used for. I don’t understand the reason for your comment. Did you read the post?

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          22 days ago

          One of the interesting things for the possible usefulness though is you never see firehouses acquiring these. They already have tools that achieve all the use cases. That’s half of fires deal, being prepared for all sorts of emergencies - not just fires.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            21 days ago

            Yeah I started typing about the equipment emergency services have that cover everything they are likely to encounter, and they use those, instead of MRAPs, because they are better specialized for their job, and far more cost effective. I ended up not feeling like finishing it.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Yeah, cities that get them have no clue about the long term costs. A lot of those ‘free’ units are now just sitting in a fenced parking lot and are unusable.

      When I was younger and a volunteer firefighter in a small rural town, we needed to replace one of our ‘grass rigs’ for fighting wildland fires. We had used it for over 35 years - and we got it second hand from our state DNR for free. We thought a Humvee truck style bed would make a fantastic grass rig. We checked in on it and the DOD straight up told us nope, you can’t have a used one - no one can get one. We use them for target practice. Perhaps they saved us from a money pit. We ended up with another used pickup from the DNR return pool.

  • Noble Shift@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    This is because Texas cops have those enormous attack surfaces on their brittle brittle egos.

    Plus who doesn’t love to LARP?

      • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s kind of my point. $18 per person is a ridiculous cost. They have a population of ~37,000 people. It would be less inexcusable if it were in Dallas (~1.3m). I mean, police stations don’t need vehicles like that at all, but it’s even more disgusting that a town that small spent money on that.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      The police didn’t pay anything for it, it’s on a free loan from DoD. US taxpayers paid something for it for sure but the police (and specifically DFW people didn’t have to foot that bill

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        That’s a lie, they have to pay shipping, conversion and up keep.

        They probably already spent 150k to get there and set up…

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    21 days ago

    To adapt an old joke: “If you see a raging dipshit driving like a lunatic in the middle of the road with their giant-ass car, you should contact the nearest police officer immediately. It’s possible they’re behind the wheel.”

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        There’s absolutely no fucking god damned way in the 7 hells that a Tahoe with Police shit in it $700,000.

        And if police departments are spending that much on a Tahoe, they need to be dismantled and investigated for embezzlement.

          • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            Do you have any idea how much it costs to service something like that??? You don’t take it down to the local garage. The thing probably costs 30k a year just in service costs.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            22 days ago

            I hope you realize what you’re saying is that taxpayers paid less for the same vehicle the second time than they did the first time.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      It’s apparently a “Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle”. What is it for: “It’s designed for high-water rescues (which saved many people this past week during the floods), active shooter situations, hostage rescues and other critical incidents, ensuring the safety of our officers and community,”

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      Found this: “It’s designed for high-water rescues (which saved many people this past week during the floods), active shooter situations, hostage rescues and other critical incidents, ensuring the safety of our officers and community,”