• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        If you dont care about Ad search engines, Studies, Pocket, Google Safebrowsing, search suggestions, a start page with ads, weak privacy settings, all cookies saved forever, no adblocking, a unique canvas fingerprint, a user agent containing your Linux Distro,…

        I went through the arkenfox user.js and literally all of it minus 20 or so settings just make sense. The rest are kinda overkill, but really, Firefox is horrible out of the box.

        It is really modular luckily

        • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          “horrible” being mostly sensible for the average user, as well as basic telemetry for making development much easier. but muhhh nooo with that information they can know who exactly I am!!! preach!!!

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          really, Firefox is horrible out of the box.

          It is really modular luckily

          Taking shit, but even you still have to recognize excellent software design.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Stop harrassing me please. Just because you are fine with something, you cant say anyone else is talking shit.

            Firefox is really modular, and that makes it different from the other browers.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I don’t see how a couple of replies could be considered harassment just because I used the phrase “talking shit”. The fact is that you’re fear mongering, and you apparently don’t like it being questioned.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Most of these aren’t issues or are “solved” in a couple of seconds.

          I am curious, exactly how would it be remotely possible for me to care that my UA string mentions Ubuntu when that’s not even technically my distro? I cannot summon an ounce of concern there. Seriously, how the hell would that matter in the least to anyone?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I knew you would say that. I imagine that user agent strings as a concept are bad, in your opinion?

              • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                They are useful to differentiate mobile from PC devices. That is not needed as many Websites are dynamic, but useful for some.

                As all browsers also support the common web standards, it is also not necessary for determining supported features or something.

                The only other use I find is having download links targeting the platform, but especially on Linux that is not really useful

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  “useful” is relative. I prefer a world where websites can know which platforms users are coming from, as it helps them know where to focus their support efforts.

                  There are billions of users but probably only a few OSes mentioned in UA strings so it seems like a decent trade off to me. My exact UA string is likely shared by millions of users even though my OS is somewhat rare on the world stage. Until the day comes that web browsers work exactly the same way on every platform, at which case I’d agree with you, no longer useful. Unfortunately for decades we’ve been quite a bit short of that end.

                  Just checked because I couldn’t remember exactly what OS info mine included last I looked. It’s quite generic: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Jokes on you, cause a lot of alphabet organizations set up entry and exit nodes on Tor so you’re being tracked regardless.

      • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most of my Tor activity is on onionsites, so that’s okay.

        Also, even given spooky nodes, the chances of getting a spooky entry and exit node are slim. Still, given the possibility, it is advisable to do spicy clearnet activities away from home with a MAC randomizer as insurance in case you win the world’s worst roulette game.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I think the big problem I have with tor is that there’s no way to know how compromised the network is. From a three letter agency budget, setting up 30,000 nodes wouldn’t be a big deal, you just have them doing other things.

          Of course, I’m not really doing anything that would draw the ire of a three-letter agency, so even tor is overkill.

          I was also never really big on people running bad s*** through my node. I’ve always felt better using a paid proxy then at least claims not to log, Even if there’s a half decent chance that people are watching their ingress and egress at the ISP level.

  • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Clearly 🐺. Been on it like, 3y+? Maybe longer, it’s been my primary for a long time. 🦊 as a backup, and for DRM stuff. Chrome/Chromium for shit that just doesn’t play well with 🦎. Edge (for windows) is my ‘I need to test this with a vanilla browser’ and cba to disable ublock etc from chrome incognito.

    Iceraven, with backup Vanadium, on mobile.

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      For mobile, I’d recommend Mull instead of Iceraven

      Pros:

      • Just like Iceraven, a fork of Fenix
      • incorporates the arkenfox user.js
      • Doesn’t have “No warranties or guarantees of security or updates or even stability!” in its project description

      Cons:

      • APKs are only on FDroid
      • awful name, no animal reference
      • awful logo color scheme imo - magenta on turquoise is… an interesting choice

      Here’s a probably somewhat biased but from quickly skimming over it not inaccurate browser comparison by the developer(s) of Mull:

      https://divestos.org/pages/browsers

      Also based GrapheneOS user

      • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve tried Mull and went back, but I can’t remember why. Iceraven is ‘fine’ but seems a touch buggy for some builds. I used to use Fennec for a long time, but I think IR allows installing ‘unofficial’ add-ons that haven’t been vetted or whatever by Mozilla for mobile. But I’ll have a look see, maybe my issue with Mull has been resolved.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    NetCat. /s

    Seriously though, I just use Firefox. LibreWolf is basically Firefox with stricter defaults, and over the years I’ve already tweaked Firefox to use all the privacy features anyway.

    I know there’s some extra sauce implemented in LibreWolf that Firefox lacks, but that stuff seems like too much of a compromise for me (like canvas fingerprinting).

    Plus, I think orange looks nicer in my window list than blue.

    I also don’t use tor or a vpn unless I can’t access anything otherwise. I guess I don’t really see the need to, since I don’t think I’m doing anything that’ll draw the government’s attention.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Firefox may silently opt you into “features” such as targeted advertising. Librewolf acts as a barrier.

      Also “nothing to hide” is fine if you have nothing to say and you don’t care about liberty.

    • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You can turn off canvas fingerprinting or any added feature with a single checkbox. I used to feel the same way about LibreWolf, but once I familiarized myself with the different settings, it became clearly the superior option if you value privacy. I also set my Firefox settings strictly, but then they added new “features” and turned them on by default. That was the last straw for me.

    • FuryMaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I started moving from Firefox to LibreWolf and found a few too many convenient features broke.

      I think password and bookmark syncing was too difficult to move away from, as I use them across devices/phone.

      Haven’t had time to research alternative methods or practices.

  • banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    [Richard Stallman] usually does not browse the web directly from his personal computer. Instead, he uses GNU Womb’s grab-url-from-mail utility, an email-based proxy which downloads the webpage content and then emails it to the user.

    If you’re not doing this you’re not properly paranoid.

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I saw a post earlier this week where Firefox was adding an AI to the browser? That’d make me migrate to libre wolf or water fox.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I would use LibreWolf IF it had cloud sync, since that’s a feature I actively use with regular Firefox.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Tor Browser is this kid wearing many layers of different masks and hoodies, and changing them randomly whenever the mood strikes.

  • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I have five browsers and couple vpns and some extras that I have mix matched to create sort of tier system depending on how legal is the activity I partake in.

    Most illegal though you have to physically relocate to some unprotected/enterable hotspot by car