• robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    YouTube is too big. I’ve been trying to use Rumble when I can. It has a lot of right wingers that were banned from YT, which sucks, but I hope to see any alternatives to YT thrive and grow.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sadly it will, and I’ll ahve to stop using it since I mostly use it to listen to stuff while I’m at work

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    How many people would be unable to use youtube because they have a broken camera or dont want youtube to access their camera

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Here’s how this is going to happen:

    1. Someone rolls out this technology, everyone of course, fucking hates it, especially since a lot of people have Youtube videos on for background noise.
    2. Someone else uses this tech for shock value, perhaps a company putting something horrific that people can’t look away from as a misguided way to get the ad in people’s heads.
    3. These incidents lead to either the US, EU or China getting up in arms and banning the tech.
    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Good plan, I wonder how expensive it is to insert an horrible ad, that doesn’t advertise anything, just be the most horrible thing you can watch like war suicides, gore and the grossest porn. I suspect google never imagined their advertising content as an hostile vector. Probably has not even content ID running on it.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      These incidents lead to either the US, EU or China getting up in arms and banning the tech.

      You were doing good then you completely lost any sense of realism.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      While we are on the subject of using yourube for background noise… why the fuck are they serving me ads for mobile games with an obnoxious narrative? If you know I am just listening, why not just serve a normal radio type ad. I am never going to download a mobile game while using YouTube for music.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      These incidents lead to either the US, EU or China

      Excited to read the “China won’t let you look at this picture of a puppy because their country lacks freedom” Op-Eds when the technology is released.

  • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This will be the death of YouTube for me. I pay for YouTube premium so this day may never come for me.

      • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The biggest reason I pay for it is supposedly creators I watch get paid significantly more than someone who sits through ads without skipping. I also don’t really watch regular TV.

          • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah, I know it’s not an excuse but I’m lazy and this guarantees even the individuals I watch irregularly gets their share. I’ve heard it even pays out if it’s demonetized (don’t take my word on that one though.)

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That didn’t keep Amazon from adding ads to the paid version of Prime and making a higher paid tier. How much easier is it for Google to implement the same?

      • Nine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        And when that happened I stoped watching prime and just put on my eye patch & tricorn 🏴‍☠️…

        Though I’m still paying for the content I just watch it differently than intended 🤷‍♂️

        • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Seeks like a bunch of us chose to do the same. These companies actually believe there is no end to what they think they’re entitled .

      • rwhitisissle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        How much easier is it for Google to implement the same?

        The correct question is actually “when will Google implement the same?” Because this is a “when will it happen” question, not a “will it happen” question.

  • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m just gonna watch YouTube on a computer without a webcam. Now this will prevent them from doing shit like this.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      "We didn’t detect a Webcam on your device. You can only watch videos on devices with a Webcam. Do you want Premium*? Click here for only 29,99 per month.

      *With Premium you also only can watch videos on devices with a Webcam"

      This is only 2025, a year later they also want a list of the people you love the most so they can kidnap one to demand you buy Premium, which will mean they will get you premium looking ads instead of shitty looking ads.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone will find a way to take a looped video of them watching their computer intently and feed it through their webcam. The ad battle will never end.

      • whatdis@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        alternatively: Please wait 2 days for the new GoogleCamPro we have shipped to arrive. Please note that without a Google Premium subscription your webcam feed will have ads in it

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Premium lets you watch ads with up to 4 blinks per ad without pause or a total of .4 seconds of looking away from the ad without pause.

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Your bonus month of premium for climaxing during an ad is almost over! Continue premium or we will show the video of you to everyone you know.

      • Resol van Lemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I need the dude in the video to talk with me if I want a webcam.

        Oh, let me guess, I also have to have a microphone as well so that I can’t be allowed to express discontent over an ad?

        • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yes, you need a microphone, and allow them access to your bank account. If you didn’t smile, vocally approve AND purchased the ad content you will be punished by 12 tripple ads instead of 4 double. Saying anything bad about Google or YouTube and you will get an automatic double priced Premium subscription for 6 months. This effect stacks. It will also not give you less ads. Refusing to watch any video on YouTube anymore will cost you your first born child.

    • pkmkdz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      vr goggles have entered the chat

      for those that don’t know, in vr most apps to avoid motion sickness keeps player in it’s own “space”. Users can look away from virtual screen displaying content or text, just by turning their heads around. But, for example in games, when content is important (ex. story dialogue subtitles) the content is programmed to try to move in front of player’s view at all times, even if it’s obstructing rest of the virtual world

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      The image won’t load, but based on the replies, I think it’s a weeping angel, and now I don’t want the image to load.

  • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    They won’t do this. They can’t even force you to watch every ad. Reloading the video after the first ad plays will skip the rest of the ads.

  • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    See, I have no doubt they would if they could, but i doubt such things are actually feasible.

    Like right now I just refresh the page to skip ads on my phone.

    • Deello@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I remember playing with a similar feature on my Galaxy S3 back in the day. Eye scrolling. The phone would scroll for you when it sensed you looking at the bottom of the screen. That was the S3. It was not perfect but very usable. My hands always felt faster so I never kept it on but it was a fun thing to play with. I’m sure the only thing stopping them is the fear of backlash. We’ll get there in time I’m sure :/

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        The tech exist but enforcing that people use it is another matter. They cannot even properly paywall Picture in Picture and background play on IOS.

      • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Them existing and Google being able to enforce people turn them on, and consistently blocking everyone who doesn’t, is a whole other problem that is a lot more complex.

      • fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hell, phones have them built in. Your iPhone literally knows not to dim the screen if it can see that your eyes are looking at it.

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think some vr headsets have them so it’s not like you need a huge package either cus it’s 95% screen

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It’s entirely feasible.

      Amazon had full head tracking, including gaze, in the Fire Phone a decade ago.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s practically feasible, just not yet deemed profitable enough to do.

          Flying cars are not practically feasible.

          • megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not practically feasible because people will find ways around it. The app can require an eye tracking features to be turned on, but people will go to the browser site. If they get the people making a browser to integrate it, then people will use another browser. They’d have to block access on any mobile browser that doesn’t enforce it, and that’s a futile effort.

            At least on IOS, they tried to lock Picture in Picture and background play behind a paywall, but that only worked in the app, and both features still work for the mobile site with a bit of fussing. Just because they implement restrictions and features doesn’t mean they can actually get them to work enough that people won’t glitch around them.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They could.

      Default is 60s ad block. However, enabling ‘Regular User’ feature will bring this down to a more convenient 15s block so you get your content faster every time. To enable this feature, tap Allow when prompted for camera permissions.