• Zacryon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Progress takes time. Overton window and shit like that. Babysteps. Slow, but steady.

      • homura1650@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This isn’t progress. It is actively incentiving having compensation be tips in the tax code.

        • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Politics is funny, like an oversized truck driven by an oversized grandma whose reflexes have slowed with time. The truck is unwieldy due to its size, and the driver often unable to see over the steering wheel until there is a bump that causes her to glance at more of the road than she’s used to seeing. Even when Grandma does react, the truck is slow to move, and if it moves quickly it runs the risk of tipping over.

          We do need bigger change. That change will NOT happen overnight, too much damage has been done. What we need to do is walk back the worst damage, reinforce codes and laws to stop them being overturned by holiday worshipping dick heads, tackle creating a foundation to work off of, and then work towards larger, more meaningful change. In that order. Maybe swap around the middle as needed if blocked by certain justices.

          Every single inch will be fought for. Every real change challenged. Harris and the party she hopefully recreates will need our support. Even Old Man Willow Biden bowed when we sang our song loudly enough, together.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            But this is not an improvement, this is dividing the middle and poor classes into two categories from a taxation perspective.

            • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              And we can effectively shift that balance. I will never willingly advocate for things that hurt people. Though I can be ignorant just like anyone else. What I will do is ask us to come together and seek positive change in the most effective ways, even if that means a temporary set back, so long as there are plans to shore it up quickly. This is because I recognize that short-term sacrifices will probably be necessary to achieve a more positive, bigger picture outcome.

              HOWEVER, as we are seeing and experiencing, we as a united voice can help enact better changes and less sacrifices by all yelling into the wind. Seems that when enough people do it, our voices carry rather well.

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Ok, so you’re just here to talk like a politician instead of talking about the subject of the conversation, got it 👍

        • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That’s what they told us with Obama, and Clinton and look where we are. Fuck that. Either actually be a leftist or get out of the way for someone who will.

            • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Like someone else mentioned, all this would do is incenstivize tipping culture from a restaurant/worker point of view, rather then the better option… Company that employs the person should be paying them, crazy idea.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s what they told us with Obama, and Clinton and look where we are. Fuck that. Either actually be a leftist or get out of the way for someone who will.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is stepping backwards. It actively since tivizes companies to not pay a liveable wage because tipped income doesn’t get taxed.

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It always comes back to Reagan. This is what happens when you elect an actor celebrity with fucking active dementia to office. He becomes a useful tool to enact policy that the general public does not benefit from because he can remember the lines and deliver it in a package that they are willing to swallow.

        Let’s not do it again.

        • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          So many people worshipped this fucking asshole for decades. All it takes to impress a large number of Americans is a couple of cruel quips.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why shouldn’t people pay taxes on tips, though? I pay taxes on 100% of my income…

      • echo@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        My answer would be that there shouldn’t be tips. Everyone should be receiving a living wage and tips should be relegated to the vulgar past.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          I agree, but that’s not an answer to my question. It’s an answer to a different question.

          • echo@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Because, in the vast majority of cases, those who are getting tips don’t even get guaranteed standard minimum wage, but something substantially lower. Most of the time, these are people who are going to get an EIC anyway, so just let them keep it in the first place.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Doesn’t make any sense, income is income is income, if it’s a remuneration you get for work you accomplish your should pay taxes on it. You’ve got waiters making 100k a year (before you say that doesn’t happen, I worked with a bunch of them) that would pay taxes on 15k and the rest would be tax free while you make 60k a year and pay taxes on everything?

              • echo@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                And, if we get rid of tipping and pay them a fair wage then all of the smoke and mirrors / abuse goes away. Further, maybe you shouldn’t be paying much if any taxes on 60k/year…

                Quit falling into the logic trap that this is a fight between those who don’t get enough. The rich need to be paying a hell of a lot more and the poor need to be paying a hell of a lot less.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  You’re mixing issues there, this is exactly what eliminating taxes on certain forms of income would lead to, fights between people of the lower classes, I can tell you from experience because at my previous job we were in this exact situation, salaried employees knew that tipped employees didn’t pay taxes on everything they got and would work against them when negotiating to renew their collective agreement instead of joining hands and fighting against the employer.

                  The fact that rich people don’t pay their fair share is a separate issue entirely and even if then did it wouldn’t make it ok to eliminate taxes on certain work related forms of incomes instead of adjusting tax brackets.

      • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Most of them don’t already. They just don’t report cash tips on their taxes. This was a cheap way for Trump to gain votes, so Harris went along with it.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Good. Taxing tips is bullshit. Even 45 can be accidentally right once in a while. Do Tax on Wall Street Speculation instead.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why is it bullshit? Just because your income comes from clients instead of your boss doesn’t mean it’s not income.

      Hell, the US became the US because of the “no taxation without representation” thing, should people who with for tip not be eligible to vote?

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because employers use tips as a reason to pay workers less, even less than minimum wage. It’s a tax on the lower working class. Meanwhile executives like Bezos pay almost zero taxes.

        • breakingcups@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          So why choose the wrong solution then? Tax billionaires fairly. Don’t arbitrarily make the waiter not pay taxes but the cook in the back has to? That’s not equal, that’s not fair.

          • Boozilla@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think tips in general are bullshit and the real answer is to raise minimum wage much higher, so it keeps up with worker productivity. I would prefer that, and to do away with tipping culture entirely. However, passing a tax relief thing is always much easier goal in the US than raising minimum wage, so I’m not letting an ideal internet reply guy solution get in the way of something that actually helps workers. As for it not being fair to the cooks in the back, different jobs pay differently. And believe it or not, some wait staff do share tips with the cooks.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Ok but you said so yourself, it’s work being paid, it’s earnings, are you saying people shouldn’t pay taxes on their earnings?

              • Boozilla@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                They will still pay income taxes, just not on the tips portion. This is not at all different than the tiered taxes we already have.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  It is different though… At the moment they’re paying on all their income based on tax brackets, with the current they’ll only pay on the regular salary part.

                  I worked for tip for over a decade, it would have meant not paying taxes on about half my earnings, with tax brackets that would have meant (where I’m at) 3500$ in taxes instead of 13000$ because two thirds of the first half would have been under the minimum taxable amount.

                  Tips aren’t a gift, it’s salary that comes from customers in exchange for services. You’re creating two classes of lower income citizens if you say that some people don’t have to pay taxes on what might be the majority of their income while the rest pays taxes on all their income.

                  It’s a bad solution.

  • Crismus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Why don’t they just fix the minimum wage problems and stop allowing tipped jobs to have a lower minimum wage. Also stop letting million plus “charity” organizations employ disabled workers at $0.25. ( Goodwill is a scam)

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’d rather not further cement tips as a fundamental part of our economic system. It’s gotten so stupid to the point where you get asked for a tip before any service has even occurred and then the “service” is often just counter service which used to not be tipped. By not taxing this income, you’re encouraging more income to be paid through tips to avoid taxes. When you’re making all these little exemptions and special cases, maybe it’s time to rethink the fundamental system so that it works better as a base case rather than having all these poorly-applied bandaids.

    • GroundedGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      This will be the gateway to removing tipped minimum wage and eventually minimum wage. People often forget it is not just the employee that pays taxes on tips, but also the employer. This will also hurt an already struggling SSI system. I’d really like to see a detailed breakdown of a 10 year outlook on this plan.

  • TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would rather outlaw asking for a tip. And force all restaurants to pay a fair wage and price that into the food price.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Cool. Now let service workers get paid a living wage. Then set the minimum wage to a calculated value based on the rate of inflation and regional cost of living, instead of the idiotic fixed value system. $15/hr is at least 10 years too late.

    • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      But that would leave the elites with less money to be trickle down to the economy. Don’t you see the flaws in your proposal?

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is dumb but politically necessary. Big issue in Nevada, good signifier of who is “on the side of the working person.”

    But specifically making tips non-taxable encourages more employment to be tip-based.

    Makes more sense to cut taxes for these same people by expanding the tax bracket that goes untaxed (currently first $11k).

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    This sounds like a reason for companies to rely even more on tipping to compensate their workers… How about instead we make the companies pay the taxes on worker income earned through tipping? Then we can finally do away this ludicrous system we’re all pressured to abide by.

    • Trev625@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wow I actually really like that idea. I don’t think I would’ve ever come up with it myself. It’d be cool to have a candidate platform made up of the best crowdsourced policy ideas.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bingo, if they don’t have to report tips every employer is going to say minimums and say they must be lying if it’s more or less.

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m thinking in the political game theory, it makes sense because it’s going to force Republicans to either support it or oppose it, either of which will make them look silly as trump supporters.

      The revenue losses would need to be made up in another way, which would ideally be closing loopholes and more dependably taxing the wealthy. That is assuming that the segment of revenue from tips is even substantial enough to matter.

      Anyway it’s going to force the Trump camp to respond. And pretty much every time you do that it provokes more unforced errors from them because they are clueless.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s just going to let him parallel his abortion stance where he claims Dems are for his positions until he does them

    • recapitated@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Just another note, Biden has also mentioned he would sign this into law. This would be even better for Dems than Kamala’s promise. For an election cycle, it would basically delete any value of Trump’s promise to tip earners.

      I’ve seen “no tax on tips” on Trump billboards on my area. Clearly Trump thinks it’s an important issue. Having made them waste money would be a hilarious win, also preventing undecided voters from turning out for Trump on this single-issue is a clear strategic design.