• kenkenken@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    But why politicians spread propaganda on social networks? Drug dealers should ask them.

  • pop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wake me up when the “Congress” actually decides to take actions not just ask “questions” after the damage is done and money is made.

    Seems more like election season shenanigans where the government wants to make a last bit effort of making it seem like they’re doing their job but then nothing happens after. Like clockwork.

    • micka190@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Wake me up when the “Congress” actually decides to take actions not just ask “questions” after the damage is done and money is made.

      Right. Into Cryo-Sleep you go, then!

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes this is there way of looking like they’re doing something without having to actually fix it.

      When they fix problems they don’t have ammo to rile up the idiots.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    [raises hand] I know why. It’s because Meta is a trash hole and lives to exploit people.

  • Podunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Shit, this winter, for 3 days strait, i got ads with literal swinging dicks and full on penetration. Reported ads, and moved on. After day three, i deleted the app and only launched from a sandboxed browser with an ad blocker.

    Now, i only open it for the marketplace. The place was cancer anyhow, but that was just too much.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Triggggerd ! Today’s ads are targeted and way more sophisticated than years ago. Maybe watch less porn? 😆

    • KaRunChiy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I found out that in most apps that advertise, the act of hovering on an ad and blocking it greatly increases the chance of seeing the same or similar ads

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Too little, too late, though, in classic Congress style

      The Myanmar Rohingya genocide was nearly a decade ago now, and we’re somehow still at the “asking Mark nicely to do a better job of moderation” step, somehow

  • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Like be gives a fuck! He’s just gonna tell them what they want to hear and then he’s going back to making millions off of fakebook

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If the FBI showed up at his office with an arrest warrant you better believe that shit would get fixed in a hurry.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If the FBI showed up at his office with an arrest warrant you better believe that shit would get fixed in a hurry.

      But then the FBI would never do anything like that to billionaires.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Zuck should ask congress why they’re violently maintaining prohibition despite it being an inherently murderous and racist failure.

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Meta appears to have continued to shirk its social responsibility

    Why would anyone assume Meta cares about any form of “social responsibility”? They’re an ad company that wants to hoover up your data so they can maximize the profit from the ad space they sell. That’s it. Anything they do that’s “socially responsible” is to get people to use their platform so they can sell more ad space.

    So the answer to this question is simple: it makes money. It’s really that simple. As long as they don’t sell drugs directly, they’re not really breaking any laws, at least not any laws that can’t be dismissed with plausible deniability.

    And honestly, I don’t have a problem with it. I think most drugs should be legal for recreational use, provided people get drugs through legal means. The problem then simplifies to ensuring drug distribution is done legally (i.e. harder drugs should only be used w/ supervision, limits on total amount sold to an individual, etc), and tax revenue can be used for rehab. I think that’s a much better approach than bans, because we can now track users and bake remediation into the system.

    I absolutely hate everything about Meta, but blocking ads for drugs isn’t a real solution. I highly doubt people are using because they saw an ad on Facebook or Instagram, so the problem here isn’t about the ads, but about distribution.

  • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Facebook is the drug. It’s addictive, mind altering, exploits dopamine hits, isolates individuals in bad circles, makes you spend longer on the toilet etc. It’s literally the blue pill.

  • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Facebook coke and E. Ehhhh that’s gotta be like asking for as much fentanyl cut in as possible.