• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Won’t predators just use something else such as readily available open source software, reducing this legislation to a mass surveillance bill to spy on and control regular citizens?

    How isn’t this anything more than a license to invade your privacy on this weak-ass premise that maybe you’re a criminal and stupid enough to use Facebook Messenger (or similar)?

    • kbal@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      It’s only the latest gambit in a world-wide effort (seemingly led by the five eyes) to undermine and eliminate any widespread use of end-to-end encryption so that they can continue spying on everyone.

    • onion@feddit.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I’m not sure which court you’re talking about.
      But this has been going on for years, they’re trying again and again. After the last proposal was deadlocked in the Council they now narrowed the scope slightly by excluding text messages, which seems to work as France is wavering on it’s contra-stance.

        • Tarogar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          It’s not illegal when you have to “consent” or basically be unable to use any chat service properly. At least that is what they seem to think. I am no legal expert in that matter but it’s still shitty that they are effectively trying to force you to consent to it.

  • 0x815@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Criminals have already been using alternative ways to exchange data for a lo.g time, especially those who are exchanging images and videos (such as CSAM) as everyday messengers are completely inapt for transmitting such large volumes of data. And these algorithms will yield a lot of false positives too.

    And it is the wrong signal to authoritarian countries as it makes people and companies extremely vulnerable. As Markus Hartmann, Chief Public Prosecutor in the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia, said not long ago on chat control:

    “From the point of view of information security there is to assume an increased risk [of hacking]. There is no special expertise [demonstrated by politicians] in this area with regard to the signal effect for authoritarian states.”

    [Original link in German, translation my own.]

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    This won’t stop actual predators.

    This will punish normal people, the actual criminals will just use something else, like always.

    Fuuuuuccckk these inept computer illiterate idiots that come up with this… Is what I would say if I didn’t know this is just thinly veiled attempt #364163549 at getting rid of encryption so that they can monitor the everything while nobody else can, of course…