Please forgive my wack ass microscope

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’m really not.

    Genotype can be extremely stable and produce wildly varying phenotypes.

    However, if a phenotype is extremely stable, pretty much the genome has to be as well.

    And just aside from what I meant.

    Monocrops aren’t necessarily genetically stable just because they only have one genome. It can be a shit genome.

    A stable plant wouldn’t start revegging because it got some more sunlight, that’s the inherent characteristic of cannabis because of its resilience.

    Did you have a stroke or something? Or are you just pretending to understand a thing well, when in reality, you don’t really know that much? Because I’m rather sure it’s the latter.

    Again, a stable genotype doesn’t mean it’s a good genotype.

    For instance let’s imagine a person. Let’s imagine this person has absolutely zero relatives who don’t have dark hair.

    Their genome is stable. It might be bad and incestuous, but the genome is rather stable.

    If there’s a person who has dark and light haired people in their family, someone who’s family is very genetically diverse, their genome isn’t as “stable”. They’ll be a more healthy person with all likelihood. Which is also why cross-bred dogs are generally healthier than breeds with stable genomes.

    However with cannabis, we’ve managed something like what with have with dogs; an extremely varied set of strains (or breeds) which are still mostly very stable, and only a minority of which are actually overbred and have problems.

    Being able to reveg has no bearing on genotype stability, lol.