cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/18210719
Facebook is banning posts that mention various Linux-related topics, sites, or groups. Some users may also see their accounts locked or limited when posting Linux topics. Major open-source operating system news, reviews, and discussion site DistroWatch is at the center of the controversy, as it seems to be the first to have noticed that Facebook’s Community Standards had blackballed it.
[…]
DistroWatch says that the Facebook ban took effect on January 19. Readers have reported difficulty posting links to the site on this social media platform. Moreover, some have told DistroWatch that their Facebook accounts have been locked or limited after sharing posts mentioning Linux topics.
If you’re wondering if there might be something specific to DistroWatch.com, something on the site that the owners/operators perhaps don’t even know about, for example, then it seems pretty safe to rule out such a possibility. Reports show that “multiple groups associated with Linux and Linux discussions have either been shut down or had many of their posts removed.” However, we tested a few other Facebook posts with mentions of Linux, and they didn’t get blocked immediately.
[…]
Addition to include the DistroWatch link: https://distrowatch.com/weekly-mobile.php?issue=20250127#sitenews
Are there really that many Linux users discussing on Facebook? My brothers in Open Source, there are much better places even without this ban…
Clown show, one of the reason to not to use proprietary software
i don’t want to expose my ignorance or nuthin, but- does deepseek run on linux?
Of course, its just an open source LLM that you can run on open source software like Ollama or LoLLMS
I mean they are not wrong, Linux is a very big threat of good cyber security which makes it harder for them to collect information. I am not at all surprised that Facebook views cyber security practices as a threat( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Sure but those links to sketchy .apk games of which the ad for them involves rape or kidnapping usually are a-okay
We’ve been on the receiving end of attention like this from Microsoft for longer than Facebook has been a thing, if Zuck thinks this is gonna make a dent in things, he’s mistaken.
Its not suckerberg, it’s Microsoft doing this. Not the first time, not the last either, definitely a low and scary step, though. This is one step in the direction of “let’s literally kill the competition”
Remember the first time I read about Linux (long time ago) and they were basically calling it a communist os (not even joking) first site on Google at the time was all about how it was unpatriotic to use it etc.
a communist os
That’s exactly what it is
Probably not in the sense that the average American uses the word “communist”, which is more about their remembered history of authoritarian regimes of the USSR and mid 20th century China and those sorts. Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and the atrocities thereof.
Linux is communist insofar as it is open source, and therefore less affected or tied up in capitalistic practices. Capitalists still use and contribute to Linux, but often those contributions go back into the commons of the open source code.
You probably know all that, I’m just feeling long winded.
Okay that gave me a hearty chuckle, thank you.
You’re not referring to this satire article by chance?
Who hurt Facebook? This must be some unintended issue or else what do they have to do with Linux? Facebook has 0 reasons to do it
You mean besides the fact that Linux gives power and choice back to the user, and that goes against everything Facebook stands for?
To be fair, Meta is the only US based AI player that open sources their models. Fuck meta in general, but it’s hard to say that they are wholly opposed to open source.
That and Linux is kind of like a software implementation of socialism and it’s been a smashing success.
Did not expect “Linux users” to be this early in the stanzas of “First they came for the […]”
I mean, Linux literally runs the world, so if this is the best he can do, not even my bunny slippers are gonna be spooked.
Are we the illuminati?
Are we the baddies?
No, no, we’re not the… wait what distro you running?
I’m running the one true distribution, SCO
Gentoo on desktop.
Weird and shitty, but who gives a fuck about Facebook?
Everyone over the age of 45 and is not tech inclined
How many of them give a fuck about Linux?
Those who need it the most. Imagine them just asking questions about what this Linux thing is to their friends.
among the not tech inclined? not many i’d reckon
Ehh, we still have family and HOA’s that only use Facebook.
hell, my kid’s school still uses Twitter to communicate that the busses have left.
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/mark-zuckerberg-joe-rogan-facebook-censorship-biden
Zuckerberg on Rogan: Facebook’s censorship was “something out of 1984”
“It really is a slippery slope, and it just got to a point where it’s just, OK, this is destroying so much trust, especially in the United States, to have this program.”
He said he was “worried” from the beginning about “becoming this sort of decider of what is true in the world.” Zuckerberg praised X’s “community notes” program as superior to Facebook’s model.
Way to tackle censorship, Zuck…
The irony is Facebook is a major contributor to a lot of open source software, and Zuckerberg in particular publicly praised the “open” approach of Llama and some other projects. Buts it’s clearly all just self serving, huh?
I just can’t believe. wth?
Yeah, I’m pretty sure Facebook infra runs on Linux.
Facebook itself runs on Linux. There’s a 0% chance it runs on Windows Server.
Go and read original Distrowatch post and tell me this doesn’t sound like a plausible and way more boring explanation.
- There is an ongoing US-China trade war that started 2 presidents ago.
- Mark Zuckerberg wants to fellatio Donald Trump (hence dropping pretence of social responsibility).
- Mark Zuckerberg wants to participate in this trade war somehow so he bans mentions of Chinese tech.
- Distrowatch mentions OpenKylin, a Chinese Linux distribution, gets flagged.
- Facebook support (person making around $3.5 per month in some third world country) doesn’t know difference between specific Linux distro and Linux itself, tells Distrowatch that Linux is now banned.
- Distrowatch doesn’t research anything and cries foul without second thought because Meta is evil.
- We live in everyone is dumb timeline.
CORPO-FOSS WAR
The great prophet @pmjv@lemmy.sdf.org has warned us for this.
I wonder if microsoft asked them to do this, either way this is something that shouldnt be ignored. Its basically direct attack and their endgoal might be to make regular people hate or fear linux. That in turn could be used to influence laws and try to ban or limit linux to corporate use only. Computers have become so integral part of society that by controlling the operating system you control the people.
I don’t think it was Microsoft, in the past few years they’ve been being a little chill towards Linux.
As for being an attack, even if they wanted to, they couldn’t get rid of Linux. Even the US government can’t tell people to stop using it. I mean, they can tell people to stop, but there’s no practical way for them to enforce such a law. Most distros out there also distribute via torrent, so even if you took down the websites for all the distros, you couldn’t stop the distribution of the ISOs. Not to mention, if they outlawed or restricted Linux, I can’t think of anything that would absolutely make the Linux users become very rebellious. Imagine the majority of the hackers, white, gray, and black hat, all of a sudden becoming very angry with the US government. It would be absolute chaos.
Not to mention, there are corporations like Valve and Ubuntu that have invested millions into Linux. I don’t believe for a second they would just lay down and not fight the government outlawing something that has become very lucrative for them.
yeah, i hope i’m just overthinking. Its just that linux is basically only true freedom we have what comes to operating systems. Maybe they just want to keep people who dont know that much about computers away from linux. Though that should be opposed just as well.
I will dig out my old tails drive just out of spite if they do that.
it shouldnt be allowed to go there because it might not be reversable by then. I wish I was just paranoid but way the world is going makes this very plausible.
By the time things like that become evident its like trying to stop a boulder that has been gaining momentum for a while, which is why I wish people were more active about doing something instead of waiting until there is clear evidence that something should be done. This kind of wasnt a direct reply to content of your comment, sorry
I am reminded about the catchphrase for GrayJay: Follow Creators, Not Platforms
