Hong Kong has announced its first arrests under a new security law - detaining six people for publishing social media posts which “incited hatred” against Beijing.

Five women and one man - including activist Chow Hang Tung - were arrested on Tuesday, it was announced.

Officials said the group were posting messages targeting a “sensitive date” - reported locally as the Tiananmen Square anniversary on 4 June.

If found guilty, the group could face up to seven years in prison under the harsher penalties brought in by the new law, known as Article 23.

The law, which was fast-tracked through Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing parliament in March, covers treason, sedition and state secrets, and allows for trials to be held behind closed doors.

It expands on the national security law, imposed by Beijing in 2020.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Hong Kong has announced its first arrests under a new security law - detaining six people for publishing social media posts which “incited hatred” against Beijing.Five women and one man - including activist Chow Hang Tung - were arrested on Tuesday, it was announced.Officials said the group were posting messages targeting a “sensitive date” - reported locally as the Tiananmen Square anniversary on 4 June.If found guilty, the group could face up to seven years in prison under the harsher penalties brought in by the new law, known as Article 23.The law, which was fast-tracked through Hong Kong’s pro-Beijing parliament in March, covers treason, sedition and state secrets, and allows for trials to be held behind closed doors.It expands on the national security law, imposed by Beijing in 2020.Hong Kong’s government says is necessary for stability, but its introduction raised fears that civil liberties would be further eroded.

    Ms Chow was already in prison facing charges under the initial national security law.A barrister, she is known for helping organise Tiananmen Square memorial events in the city.

    For decades, Hong Kong was the only Chinese city where these commemorations were allowed, under the city’s semi-autonomous economic, political and legal set up - known as “one country, two systems” - established when the city was handed over to China by the UK in 1997.But events remembering the 1989 incident, which saw China crush peaceful protests in Beijing with tanks and troops, were banned in 2020.According to the South China Morning Post, Tuesday’s charges related to a Facebook group where a series of posts had appeared remembering the previous events.Secretary for Security Chris Tang - who confirmed they were Facebook posts - told reporters the subject was not the problem.He said, quoted by the SCMP, that the accused had “incited hatred against the central government and our Hong Kong government and the judiciary”.

    “This incitement of hatred is the cause of the crime,” he added.


    The original article contains 322 words, the summary contains 322 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      Remember though everybody, there is no difference between China and the US. Totally normal country, nothing to see here, just sending people to prison for years for talking about a “sensitive date”.

          • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Careful not to underestimate the authoritarian left. They seemed willing to go pretty far during COVID.

              • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                28 days ago

                Yes well, there is always a way to justify actions you support and condemn those that you don’t support. The only way to avoid an authoritarian regime of one kind or the other is to hold certain rights to be inviolable and above the scope of government. If you give the government power to remove your rights under certain circumstances then they will create those circumstances in order to use that power. Come on, you know this. And even if was for a cause you support this time, next time it might not be.

                • retrospectology@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  28 days ago

                  Nope, getting vaccinated so you don’t kill others is not to do with your rights. A million Americans died because of right-wing reality denial and disinformation. That was the actual massive betrayal of other people’s rights.