• Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    If it’s client side then pedos will just strip it out and keep on going. It’s a giant waste of time.

    • gjoel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or, you know, trivially circumvent it? Compress media, break up URLs? I don’t understand how this could possibly be effective.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        Any circumvention argument misses the point.

        90% of people won’t. The remaining 10% will be flagged and can be scrutinized more manually (without any violence which will get into news). It’s the way any surveillance works. Which is why non-backdoored e2e encryption for everyone in everything everywhere and death of centralized services are important to fight surveillance.

        It’s like flowers covering body parts on photos, we kinda guess what’s there. If the whole photo is covered with flowers, that’s another story.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Wait till they make TOR illegal and force people to mask TOR traffic to look like HTTPS. Then produce a stream of rubbish alongside said HTTPS traffic so as to fool authorities. Lol at them thinking non-profit tech gurus are going to give them cake

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            You are answering a comment explaining why this is bullshit. “Gurus” are sufficiently rare to have other kinds of surveillance.

            For some reason in every bad event there are plenty of people thinking evil is stupid.

            • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              What I’m trying to say is said gurus will build something that the masses can use (to the extent of the masses that know what Threema and Briar are).

              • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                My third sentence still applies. Do you realize that the situation presented is one with backdoors on every device and criminal responsibility for bypassing\removing those?

                • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  Yes, and this will affect everyone. Which is why I’m hopeful that organisations like the EFF, the TOR browser’s foundation, Graphene OS and the general Android community comes up with something that will prevent this. I hope this will push for greater efforts in obfuscation of traffic from TOR, I2P, Freenet, Wireguard and the like along with better education amongst the general population.

                  You could call me naive though, I suppose. Perhaps I expect too much

                  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    9 days ago

                    Police checks your phone and finds the banned piece of software.

                    Or your ISP detects traffic from something which is not reported by the backdoor on your phone.

                    There are so many ways.

                    There is no technological solution to a power problem. Power solutions to power problems include riots, revolutions, assassinations …

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          And all but guaranteed. I know I would protest this, and I’m sure there are enough like me that this would waste a lot of time for police.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s nothing to do with stopping pedos. The people pushing this year-in and year-out don’t care THAT much about pedos. It’s not a cause that’s motivating enough for them to be putting in so much effort, trying to sneak in legislation after being repeatedly rebuffed.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        It’s rather “tell me who’s your friend and I’ll tell you who you are”, most of specific people involved in pushing this have a history with authoritarian regimes, some genocidal.

        Many things may change overnight.

        It’s not a cause that’s motivating enough for them to be putting in so much effort, trying to sneak in legislation after being repeatedly rebuffed.

        Until those trying are in jail explaining their motivations in detail, this won’t stop.

      • Maestro@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        The real people pushing this are lobbyists working for the companies that sell the monitoring software.

    • Crismus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s really all about having a way to get past encryption so they can spy on everyone indiscriminately. It’s pushed that it’s to save kids and unmask pedos, but the people in charge know the pedophiles are their rich donors.

      It’s about controlling opposition and making sure the wealthy can stay on top. Imagine if no small business can hide their information from their competitors.