• Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    You either didn’t read my comment from earlier in the thread or you enjoy trying to frame an argument.

    I’ll post it below for you to read and educate yourself.

    There have been two state solutions on the table with Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital on the table multiple times. Palestinians turned every one of them down. Instead of building their own state they will be further pushed out of Gaza. Where they go is anyones guess no one wants them, especially other Muslim states.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-state_solution

    TLDR: Palestine will be wiped of the map unless they choose a different path. Israel isn’t going anywhere.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The negotiations were argued in bad faith. Israel would put forth ridiculous demands and then lay the blame on Palestine for rejecting them. Why do you think Palestinians are being pushed out of Gaza and have been continually and constantly pushed out for decades? There was never a sincere effort for a two-state solution.

      Nobody wants to take on many refugees all at once, it’s very difficult to manage. Why do you think Britain “volunteered” Palestinian land to relocate Jews out of Europe? It wasn’t out of the goodness of their heart.

      • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        No response to this of course. Don’t even expect one. They are currently with their fingers in their ears yelling “LALALLALALALA”

        • Sambarkjand@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          There’s literally a response just below yours, but of course taking the time to make sure you’re actually right is never a strong point for you people.

          I personally find it very funny that the pro-Palestinian go-to is that none of the offers Israel made for a 2 state solution were ‘realistic’ or ‘serious’ or ‘good faith’. No one doubts that there were offers. Tell me, in what other scenario in all of human history do the losers of a war (that they started) get to dictate the terms of their surrender?