Because specific treatments work in specific areas.

Sleeping for the brain, general body rejuvenation.

Antioxidants the heart, there are many experiments going on. But health could be attributed to certain treatments.

Sometimes we don’t know the full extent of the affects of treatment over the whole body.

But key aspects can change with certain treatments.

To see if there’s a net positive affect as well.

So without knowing any of the results, they’re invalid? That makes no sense

Well yeah he’s trying many things at once because he wants to extend his life and live the greatest lifestyle. It’s not 100% an experiment. Some of it is just trying to live a longer life through healthy options.

He can read the results for different areas. Ie sleep, how long, when and how that affects his well being.

He’s trying to do a good thing and ask you guys can do is bitterly try and tear it down. I think you guys have an agenda.

Well then you appear to be the unintelligent one. Or just a shill for the fast food industry that he’s threatening trying to make people better.

Because it IS peer reviewed.

Peer Reviewed and Independently Validated.

On his own website

https://blueprint.bryanjohnson.com/?srsltid=AfmBOoprwrlBC5e2ui3tNzT0pfOaOL79VbLq4rWM8ya7XvATJVnYAZ5k

What you’re doing is insidious.

You’re fighting for making people ill.

By taking readings and measurements of the human body. Seeing if your in an increased healthy state.

There are markers which shows the health of the body.

Because it seems they’re just trying to smear him. They’re attacking him for no logical reason.

I think that the food industry don’t want you to be healthy and smear campaigns like this are attacking this guy

I don’t know about that but it’s funny you focus only on that.

What about the sleep data, food data, exercise data?

You’re only focusing on a small part of the research. Which makes me think you’re buying have this discussion in good faith

Because he’s trying to do something good. Why are you attacking him so hard?

That’s a generalisation

It’s not an option though. It’s an attack. They’re just attacking his personality, or calling him names. That’s not opinion, that’s just trying to smear the guy.

They’re bad faith arguments.

Calling him a rich ar*ehole isn’t an opinion. It’s just being rude.

He’s helping himself by publishing the results for everyone? That doesn’t even make sense.

You’re being obtuse and and I question your intentions in have a good faith argument.

You’re just trying to be antagonistic now. It’s the data sets. He shows what is beneficial, what’s increasing his longevity. It’s not that hard to comprehend. What decreases issues, what increase years a live on this planet.

Why would you attack someone who’s trying to help find what helps people live longer?

No it’s the actual data sets

Anyone and everyone that is interested in longevity.

It’s the opposite of selfish, he’s publishing all of this findings to the internet for everyone to see and use.

It’s not pretend, he’s actually carrying out methodology, posting results and showing what’s effective

Why are you so angry at him?

He’s literally trying to make people live longer.

I don’t see why you’re calling him vulgar names.

He’s trying many things to see what works and what doesn’t.

Your vitriol seems misplaced and I don’t understand your aggression towards someone trying to be helpful to society in general. It’s bizarre.

I mean he’s trying to find the healthiest things to help people live longer.

I’m not sure about the dick thing. But he’s carrying out many experiments with food, sleep habits etc.

Although you’re only focusing on the erection thing. Which seems a small part of the research.

I don’t think he deserves backlash for trying to help people generally

You know what’s worse than a guy waving his arm around?

Women and children actually being murdered in Gaza.

It’s funny that this gets so much outrage but the genocide in Gaza isn’t causing as much hysteria.