seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn’t, as what a settlement might imply.
which way toothless whateverness citizen? (you know ali protesting the war didn’t shut down girlswhocode, right?)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVU72Vz3jVU vs https://www.thesun.ie/sport/boxing/5590755/mike-tyson-naomi-campbell-philosopher-ayer/
seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn’t, as what a settlement might imply.
is the threat better than the existence of the threat? does threatening mean being constantly present?
have books become too heavy for men?
for the question “will artsy dot net have to start taking age verification?” to pass nimby codes
since 2008 (the artilect wars) or the third “a.i.” winter?
the gettier problem
algorithms of oppression. noble.
as someone who observes the interests of theology that has crossed disciplines with computer science, i should only speak from that regard, than as a web developer who puts a dog in the fight of competing styles, insofar as the styles bear ontological commitments. though, obviously the web is suffering in quality due to these dogmatic “software” “engineering” practices, it must be said. there’s a wider tendency to advance metaphors which make certain paradigms more attractive to some developers than others based on philosophical prejudices coming from having accepted aristotle’s agrilogistic axioms (law of noncontradiction, metaphysics of presence, essentialism). computer science is fundamentally ontotheological, not accidental, and engineers who follow martin are committed to a politicization of the object as more real than what objects are about. their style fails to purposefully and meaningfully ground fundamentally distributed applications, necessarily. someone might contrast martin against authors like brian cantwell smith, to see the orientation from which i speak.
greater still, we’re seeing the outcome of what seems like decades of uncritical adoption of practices, what seems more like political movement than properly philosophical argumentation, everywhere in c.s. and wider applications of it.
institution: yet another non-human living asexual hyperobject constantly having sex with itself stopping only to shamefully laugh at the moments in which we respire.
ice cream truck driver
elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance