• friendlymessage@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    An article about an election without any numbers. How tight was the race? How many people voted? We will never know. In fact, the whole article contains no information that wasn’t known beforehand. Probably written beforehand and just put online by a timer as the result was not surprising. News media is going downhill faster and faster.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago
    1. It’s a very progressive district, that’s how she got elected in the first place. This is not a surprise.

    2. I bet my politics fit closer to the other guy, but I’d still vote for AOC between the two because she has a national influence and disproportionate power in the Caucus. If you’re actually voting to influence Congress towards helping your district in particular, AOC might get that done even if it’s secondary to her national political project. Some moderate guy in a safe D seat would absolutely never get anything for your district.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    fuck moderates, we’re fighting for our goddamn lives and the life of American democracy. We got no room for both-siders.

  • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I hope people stop believing the bullshit that’s trying to get progressives to not vote or to vote for 3rd parties. Progressives absolutely can win democrat tickets, and that’s exactly why there’s so much propaganda trying to convince people otherwise. Progressives have a lot of political power right now, and the whole system can swing left if people don’t just give up. Progressives giving up is the only play the right has.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Progressives should absolutely vote in primaries and lower contests. They should also make it very clear there are limits to their graciousness when our president supports blatant war crimes and genocide.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t disagree. But we’re living in interesting times.

        I don’t like most of the people on the ticket I’ll be given in November, but you know what’s objectively worse? Actual fascism. Fascism always ends in genocide, and these white Christian nationalists aren’t even trying to hide it, going mask-off even before they have the power to back it up.

        When fascists can be this bold and still keep their seats of power, that’s quite worrying.

        As I saw someone say earlier, we’re in democracy triage.

        I’d vote for Biden’s corpse before trump or not voting. We must wrest all power from the fascists before we can squabble about who’s more left.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          We must be able to effectively fight it though. And blindly voting for the elite approved opposition ends in them holding the door open for fascists every time.

      • el_abuelo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Graciousness? I don’t think that’s the right word…you don’t vote for someone because you’re being gracious, you vote for someone because you think they’ll deliver what you want - on in this case perhaps, the closest person who actually stands a hope in he’ll of getting elected.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Oh no. It’s graciousness to vote for the guy you lost to and who went out of his way to break campaign promises on unions, climate change, and immigration. Another term is good loser.

          But the point is there’s limits. There have to be limits or else you’re not a loser in a political contest, you’re a blind supporter they never need to actually listen to.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ah yes, Reddit, and a Biden specific sub. The very material of unbiased analysis.

              Also. You’re responding to something pre-debate. There are very definitely other options now. Run a debate series with select candidates, open a comment period with the state parties, and culminate in an open convention.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Good. Anyone described as a “moderate” in the US is actually a conservative at best. Anyone described as a “conservative” is actually a fascist at best.

    • Copernican@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I hate this divisive bullshit. Democracies require pluralities. You need to be a big tent party to govern.

      • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        The most divisive people in politics don’t want that big tent to be a governable coalition. If you appeal to big tent politics they start trying to incite violence including political subjugation of the same opponents that you’re trying to appeal to. You’ll see them around.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Reality check: Repubs are trying to elect an insurrectionist promising to be a dictator. I’m sorry facts are divisive, I don’t like the situation either.

        • Copernican@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Sorry. how does AOC defeating democratic moderate in a primary impact a republican getting elected. I don’t think moderate D’s or voting R on the presidential ballot. A moderate Democrat is still voting democrat.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It seems many described as “left” in the USSA are conservatives too.

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Moderate? Marty Dolan is a full-blown conservative. Why do we keep pretending like being a Democrat means you can’t be a conservative? The DNCs entire top brass is conservative. It’s a conservative party by objective international standards.

    • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because the Overton window in the United States has many people viewing fascists as friends and anyone further left than center right as “extreme left wing socialist communist Nazi terrorists”.

      • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I hate it when ignorant people conflate Nazis and communists. I have argued with so many dumb people who think that the Nazis were a Socialist party, when the exact opposite is true. These people probably think that the DPRK is democratic, too.

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’d be like thinking the Democrats and Republicans are arguing about whether America should he a direct or representative democracy.

  • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Despite his efforts, Dolan’s message did not gain enough traction. His campaign, funded largely by personal loans, couldn’t match Ocasio-Cortez’s $8 million war chest.

    You people are living in an oligarchy and “who has more money for this season” being a perfectly normal news bit outside of popular sports is completely insane.

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s because billionaires have purchased SCOTUS. The outcome of a single court case has allowed unlimited money from whomever into election campaigns.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Jesus fuck you people claim it’s rigged no matter who wins

      If the moderate wins you claim the DNC tipped the scales

      If the progressive wins you claim corpos tipped the scales

      Maybe just shut the fuck up?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Jesus fuck you people claim it’s rigged no matter who wins

        Headline: “Person with most money wins race handily”

        Far Left Antifa CCP Tankie on Lemmy: “Damn, seems like the sheer volume of money is determining the winners of these races”

        Reasonable Rational Centrist: “STFU, you stupid idiot! Why can’t you just be happy that the person with the most money won?!”

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah, that’s how elections work. If it were in good faith, it’d be a valid complaint. But it’s not. It’s just another thing they pulled from a hat labeled “how can we make Democrats look bad here?”

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Clearly Jamaal Bowman isn’t as progressive as George Latimer, but Lauren Boebert’s progressive bonafides pushed her through.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        The DNC are not moderates. They are economic far right with imperialist foreign and racist internal policy, but some LGBT rights sprinkled in between.

        And i am quite sure if people like Sanders or Stein would win it will definitely not be because of corporations funding them, more the opposite actually.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You realize that “you people” includes you, correct?

      Or are the mega rich treated just like everyone else where you are?

      If so, where is this magical land of fairness?

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Eh… There are a variety of end-runs around this mechanism.

          Hiring politicians on as lobbyists or allowing friends and family to sit on private run boards and trusts can create a back channel for money to flow into a politician’s pockets. Public money can be funneled into private profits for which the supporting politicians are also stockholders. And politicians can receive discounted/free services from friendly private sector constituencies. FOX News, the classic example, is a multi-billion dollar network dedicated to running Republican-friendly media. But when corporate lobbyists and political strategists can be found everywhere from the boards of NPR/PBS to the guest chairs of MSNBC to the editorial rooms of the WaPo/WSJ/NYT, there’s really no safe spaces left.

          You can mitigate the direct “bag of cash for favors” effect that, say, John Boehner cutting tobacco lobbyist checks on the floor of the House has produced in the past. But you can’t keep public sector administrators from finding ways to receive kickbacks via private sector channels unless you completely divorce these institutions.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Eh… There are a variety of end-runs around this mechanism.

            There are any number of hypothetical end-runs around just about anything you can think of, that doesn’t make protections, mechanisms, controls, or safeties useless.

            In the US, political bribery is nearly 100% legal. I’d rather have some hoops for corrupt officials to jump through. We don’t even make them break a sweat in this country.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              There are any number of hypothetical end-runs

              Not even hypothetical. We just had the SCOTUS kick down the door on legal bribery in Snyder v United States.

              I’d rather have some hoops for corrupt officials to jump through

              I mean, if we’ve got a magic lamp I can do better than a few hoops. But the system is of the corrupt, by the corrupt, for the corrupt.

              At some point, you’re forced to recognized the farce of democracy at work.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                IIRC, people were talking about places that aren’t the US.

                As stated, political bribery in the US is nearly 100% legal. You can even study it in school and make a career out of it.

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        I do not life in the US. However because of US hegemony and my country being a suck up to the US i have to follow what is going on there.

        But in case there is any doubt. The country i live in, which is Germany is corrupt and authoritarian with a complicit public and private media as well as the “center” parties moving further to the right and helping fascism rise faster than ever before. The “liberal” middle class are to a large extent just self delusional racists and the country will become a fascist hellhole in the next ten years.

        So if you have the opportunity, please help spread awareness about all the shit happening here too.

        • ssladam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Politics shift to the right when people feel disparity, and their future looks break. Politics shift left when people feel optimistic about their future.

          • Asafum@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Which is absolutely fucking stupid because we need leftist politics when the future looks bleak and when the future looks rosy that is the time to be more conservative about change…

            But we’re just human, we do everything ass backwards :/

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          The country i live in, which is Germany is corrupt and authoritarian with a complicit public and private media as well as the “center” parties moving further to the right and helping fascism rise faster than ever before. The “liberal” middle class are to a large extent just self delusional racists and the country will become a fascist hellhole in the next ten years.

          The funniest part is that this has been brought about by the common belief that idealism is stupid and dangerous and leads to fascism, while cynicism is very smart and realistic. One good thing about idealism is that it gives you a reason to fight and sense of good and evil.

          What I mean is that idealism, say, 20 years ago would be associated with extremism, neo-Nazis, unreformed Bolsheviks, sect members, radical Islam. But somehow the actual fighting forces sporting all such ideologies work without it too.

          As if that “sail” filled not with wind, but with popular emotion were worse than lack thereof, because without it your “boat” wouldn’t be moved from the right (presumably) track. Turns out the “boat” also has “oars”. Evil doesn’t have to be charismatic, although it was that in the 1930s. It can do just fine with apathy and half-consent.

        • DandomRude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, that’s right. The last European elections at the latest showed impressively that those dull people who are unable to see through the PR campaigns of the powerful are not an exclusive US problem. It is of course absolutely right that we in Europe rely far too much on the Americans and should set stricter limits to their capitalism, which in my opinion is completely out of joint. But I fear that we have already gotten too far into this quagmire. This is precisely why it is all the more important to raise awareness of this and to name those who are actually responsible for falling living standards and growing inequality - the US-type opportunists, the hangers-on and especially the blatant fascists in the ranks of our politicians and our societies. I am not at all convinced that the reasonable people have a shot, but I sure will continue to make an effort.

          • nogooduser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            Hopefully, the UK is going to take a couple of steps to the left shortly.

            If it does, it’s not because the country is moving left but because the right fucked up.

            • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah, it’s a great first few steps. Really hoping LibDem becomes the official opposition and it’s just two Left™ parties driving each other leftward.

              Current Labour concerns me with how it’s moved rightwards, but Daddy Starmer has my vote regardless

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t know, Labour should win a landslide next week in the UK. And Conservatives will become a party #3 or even #4 for the first time since forever. Tories also ran out of money, lol.

              • Aux@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s still FPTP here, it’s just that people got sick of Tories. Even billionaires got sick, imagine that.

            • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              You mean Keir “Tony Blair without the charisma and leadership abilities” Starmer’s Labour? Fat lot of good THAT pack of ideologically bankrupt liberals are going to do other than freeing the UK from the even worse Tories! 😮‍💨

          • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            It is, expect everything to lurch to the right for the foreseeable future. Get ready for more humanitarian crises as we in the west increase sending climate and conflict refugees back to countries of origin or 3rd countries for “asylum processing” as climate change really starts to bite.

            Also, I hope you enjoy Cold War 2: Arctic Summer Melt.

    • retrospectology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, having to listen to Steve Innskeep gleefully break the news of Bowman’s defeat on NPR this morning was not a great way to start the day.

      And of course NPR frames it as confirmation that voters support genocide, not that AIPAC uses GOP money to sabotage the Democratic party. Their reporting is getting worse and worse by the day.

        • retrospectology@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          They’re pretty bad on Israel, yeah. All Things Considered is particularly terrible.

          Innskeep and Mary Louise Kelly get me pissed of more than anyone else. Or Ayesha Roscoe. They’re all terrible interviewers.