• zarkony@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree, but unfortunately, there’s probably not a good self hosted solution to this specific problem.

      I use musicbrainz for music tagging, which is an excellent source for all metadata except lyrics. For better or worse, the only decent sources of lyrics seems to be genius and musixmatch, and neither integrate well with tagging tools like musicbrainz Picard.

      If anyone else has found an easier way to do this, I would love to hear it.

      • EndHD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’m not sure if the application is safe. It may be malicious. Proceed at your own risk.

        I saw a GitHub project called 163MusicLyrics that’s sources the information from Chinese sources (NetEase and QQ).

        The entire software is in Chinese, but the results looked really accurate from the sandbox I ran. It’s even actively developed with v6.2 releasing least week. But again, I don’t know if it’s safe.

        I’m not good at code but it looks like it’s OSS, so you could verify the code yourself or reverse engineer something with the API calls they use?

        Let me know if you come across something though. I’m also looking for a way to get LRC files easily.

        EDIT: Also for self hosting, I use Jellyfin with Symfonium, and Tailscale. It works great for me and has been relatively low maintenance.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        When listening locally on my computer I use foobar2000 and the OpenLyrics component - but yeah, it falls short sometimes unfortunately. I’ve written myself some scrapers that crawl some sites, but that still requires a bit of manual intervention. I’m still looking for a self-hosted app that can help with tags though, and more in a manual manner; I don’t really like a script assuming that this album is this specific release when it might not be.

        Besides, some files have the lyrics already in the tags - often the case when buying/downloading for free from Bandcamp.

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Deafness covers a broad spectrum of hearing difficulty, not just completely deaf. Most people that identify as deaf still have some hearing. I always forget that and had the same question as you until I read a comment further down.

      It’s likely that the person isn’t fully deaf and so can still hear some music, but deaf enough that they can’t understand the lyrics. Having the ability to view the lyrics in real time is handy rather than having to search them up all the time. Spotify also shows what lyric is currently being sung in real time, whereas you can’t get that with a Google search.

  • Faresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m so confused by people under this post defending a company’s scheme to make more money that disproportionately affects disabled people.

        • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah it’s a whole spectrum. I hear normally out of my right ear but left is at best 50% volume. Just genetics my cousins have similar hearing profiles. If I listen to music with just the right ear I feel like I’m missing out even though I can barely tell what goes on in left ear outside of bass and drums.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m thinking it’s not Spotify that is keeping deaf people from enjoying music, but fuck the subscriptions also.

  • Alchalide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ll take youtube music revanced. Installed more than a year ago, never updated since then. Logged in with Google account and still works fine.

  • Crampon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I left Spotify for Tidal. But why would anyone feel obliged for free music from a commercial host? Just self host if you dont want to pay. Piracy is always morally right. It’s preservation of cultural heritage.

    I choose to pay for Tidal because of convenience. I refuse to pay for more than 2 streaming services. It’s fairly easy for any adult to make choices like that.

    This is an imagined problem and a fairly new one to.

    Left handed people having to use tools and appliances designed for right handed people is an actual bigger issue.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    goddamned y-tube told me I ran out of skips. subscribe for more skips. skips=fucks and I’m all out

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I didn’t even know they did that, Glad I don’t have an account with them. I’m partially deaf, most music I can’t understand what someone singing. Those fun things people do of like “most common misheard lyrics” is basically my life. On the plus side I enjoy music from around the world because unintelligible music is unintelligible no matter where it’s from. They’re very few artists I feel like I can understand, and realistically I’m probably wrong.

    In real life, I read lips to help augment my terrible hearing. Fun fact during the mask man dates during COVID, was probably the worst time for me. A lot of people I could hear talking as I could hear noise but I could not make out what it was. Leading to a lot of awkward conversations.

    Anyhoo, that’s all to say that for music that I do like I do have to see the lyrics. It’s what converts the noise into words.

    So, fuck you Spotify, My life’s difficult enough already, I’m not paying your shitty service so you can charge me for my impairment.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Everyone is going on about this as anti disability, but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

      Unpaid Spotify sucks, full stop, no matter what part of you works or doesn’t.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They’re lyrics, intentionally making the service worse for people with hearing disabilities is ableist.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I would say, it because the lyrics aren’t something Spotify made. No one’s picking up Spotify because only Spotify has lyrics. Spotify isn’t writing the songs. Regardless of what someone might think of Spotify or Spotify free, it’s withholding something that they have that they didn’t make from people that perhaps need it. It’d be like if broadcast TV or any on demand video service (YouTube, Disney, Netflix, etc.), said hey you didn’t pay no more closed captions for you (where a free version is applicable, of course).

        If Spotify wants to put stuff behind a paywall it can be features of the platform.

        My personal opinion is Spotify sucks, full stop. The CEO is a real piece of work. This just goes on the pile of reason Spotify sucks.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

        why would you limit the ability to use lyrics though? It’s the same shit that every big article tabloid is doing “pay us five dollar a month and we will show you our articles, that we think are good” after showing you like three, in four months for free.

        Either give people access to the service, or don’t, don’t play the bullshit of “well actually, here’s a free sample”

        • Woht24@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Same reason any tech company limit the ability to do anything - bandwidth, ownership etc.

          Even if ‘lyrics’ are free, they still need to be written and proof read. You’re either going to have to pay other companies to provide you the lyrics or pay your staff to write them down.

          There’s so many levels to this, Spotify still sucks, but you have to look at it realistically .

  • bmeffer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve used Pandora for years. Granted, they don’t have all of the features of Spotify. But, I think their algorithm is better and my price has never changed.

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Coming from the age of ipods and piracy, Spotify was a great alternative to that and reasonably priced for the usage you could get out of it. These days is harder to justify

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Meh 6 people, almost every song we could want for less than 20 bucks is ideal.

        That said I am gearing up to change streamer just because they annoy me with UI changes, forcing originals, pushing gigs despite disabling that function…and the longest running gripe of all: let me disable censored songs you cunts. I never want the clean version.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    why the FUCK does anyone still use spotify, it’s a fucking joke. Unusable without paying for it.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, there’s a farmers market nearby with the same fucking problem. If you don’t pay, suddenly they don’t give you the fruits of their labor! Bastards…

        • pelletbucket@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          it’s incredibly simple. you use the revanced manager, check the boxes you want, and it does it for you. I don’t know how to write a patch, they’ve all been written for me. here’s their website, and here’s their GitHub. only works on Android. I personally used it to crack YouTube music instead, but you can do Spotify

    • Nelots@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      BlockTheSpot + Spicetify esentially gives you spotify premium for free. No lyrics, and no downloads, but otherwise most premium features are completely free.

      That said, I’m considering switching to Deezer, but they do have some missing songs, which is unfortunate.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Family plan is insanely good value especially if you fill it with friends (20$ for 6). If I were paying $15 for myself, never.

      • Dozzi92@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yep, same. And it’s a good service, and pretty cheap all things considered. Have found a ton of new artists, have played their songs, bought merch from their bandcamps or merch buckets, or whatever, and all because spotify’s stupid algorithm does get it right some time.

        But fuck them, I guess, for not giving enough away in their free to use tier.

        • weeeeum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Pretty good audio quality too, I have Sennheiser hd600 (300$) and have tuned the heck out of them. They sound amazing and I still cannot tell the difference between flac (uncompressed) and high bitrate mp3 (what Spotify uses).

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        They don’t have everything. I have plenty of tracks on my drive at home that aren’t available. ALSO, sometimes you’ll find a track you like and save it locally in Spotify, then Spotify decides they don’t like that track anymore and you no longer have access to it. It still shows up in your library but it’s grayed out.

        Also their shuffle button is hot garbage, at least on Android. It’s been garbage for years and it recently got even worse.

        • Guest_User@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ve never used Spotify could you give a quick run down on why their shuffle sucks? Shouldn’t it just be random songs?

          • vodka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I heard they’ve fixed it, but it used to be limited to 100 songs, and it was a simple re-order and not actually random. It’d always put tracks in the same order (unless you’ve changed something in the first 100 tracks since last time)

            You’d have a 300 song playlist, hit shuffle, and it’d “shuffle” the same 100 songs in the same order, but start at a different point every time.

            • Delphia@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Algorithms for randomness on things like spotify cant actually be true random because true random will sometimes do weird shit that makes users think its broken. Like if you put 10 songs from 10 artists on a 100 song playlist and hit random there is a not 0% chance that it will put all 10 songs from 1 artist in a row.

              • vodka@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                For sure, but I’d still prefer that over getting the same order of songs every time.

          • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            It doesn’t seem very random to me. What user “vodka” said might be true. Whatever, I can deal with that. What really grinds my gears is that Spotify frequenty turns on shuffle when I want it off, and it frequently switches to “smart shuffle” when I want regular shuffle. “Smart shuffle” will mix in songs that it thinks you might want to hear. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve turned off shuffle without having turned it on. I assume they have some competent people working at Spotify so I can’t imagine how they could have let it get to this state.

            • kronisk @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The simple answer is smart shuffle enables them to put songs in your shuffle that record companies paid them to push to you. In other words, Payola.

    • Juantonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ive had good luck using a VPN that blocks ads. So far havent gotten a single ad on the free version.

    • fiercekitten@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree with you completely but I am also one of those weirdos who just never stopped using Pandora so I have no room to talk, but 90% of my music listening is via my own music collection. IMO it’s such a better experience than anything else.

    • altasshet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I only use it in a desktop browser with ublock. It’s tolerable, but they keep taking things away…

  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I might get a bit of hate for this considering the community name, but Spotify is the one subscription I pay for and don’t feel like I’m getting ripped off. Basically every song I want is on there, they very rarely remove content, and the algorithm actually comes up with decent recommendations. I even like some of the other random features like Spotify wrapped.

    But the main difference I see vs other subscriptions is that I don’t feel locked in, since there are no Spotify originals etc if they ever make the service too shit (which admittedly they might since they keep raising the price and trying to shove podcasts down everyone’s throat) I could easily switch to a different streaming service or even go back to just buying music outright

    • Brocon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m with you on that one. Yeah they are not great. But there are far worse companys.

    • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t feel locked in, since there are no Spotify originals etc

      I don’t use Spotify so correct me if I’m wrong. But I think Spotify has podcasts that are only available there.

      I told my wife about other open source apps that have music without ads, and even though it had the music, there were some podcasts that were not available without Spotify premium outside of Spotify.

    • MostRegularPeople@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have Tidal. It costs the same as Spotify but pays artists more and actively promotes up and coming musicians. Also they aren’t part of the military industrial complex, so that’s cool.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Same, Tidal also has better sound quality and a shuffle that actually works

    • Specal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I like Spotify, and when I want to support and artist I buy their merch, or I go see them live (the amount of money they get from ticket sales depends on if it’s a live nation event or not).

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I used to like Spotify. Right now YT music feels just way better. No fluff yet, just music. Plus all of the unofficial covers which are on YT are on YT music

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        YT music does have a problem with reuploaders stealing revenue through “topics”, Upper Echelon made a video about it a few weeks ago

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I just started using Spotify for the first time last year, mainly because I got tired of trying to figure out what this meat paste wanted to listen to

      YT is great when you know what you want to hear, but it’s garbage at (music) recommendations (I haven’t tried YT music)

      Spoofie isn’t the best, but for right now, it’s worth the price just so I can actually get back to work, and not fiddle with YT for 3 hours looking for music this meat paste wants right now

      Although, I’m open to alternatives, if they’re viable

  • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    While I agree that this is stupid, why would a deaf person be using Spotify in the first place?

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Long shot guess: deaf person can “listen” to vibrations of music with their hands on a speaker but this is not possible with lyrics?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        So imagine you’re listening to rap. But you’re hard of hearing. The beats still slap, but the words aren’t intelligible. Hell the beats are even better because you got a subwoofer that shakes the floor. But you know it’s poetry, it’s about the words as much as the beats. So of course you’d want to read along

    • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      So I’m not deaf, not in the slightest, but I struggle to understand lyrics in music. I love music, I live and breathe it and I’m gonna dedicate my life to it, but I’ve always struggled with understanding lyrics in music. To me, the vocalist is just another instrument in the mix. Having lyrics to read helps me appreciate my favorite tunes more!

      • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        You might have a smidge of Speech Auditory* Processing Disorder. I do and that’s what it’s like for me. Common comorbidity with ADHD and ASD, and possibly other neurotypes.

        • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Oh almost certainly. I have ADHD, prolly autistic, and I’ve had many times where my mind stopped processing what people are saying. Which is bad when you work tourism xD

          • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yyuup. It’s bad in basically any job you have to listen to people during, and I always have to establish with friends that it is an honest mistake when I can’t understand them and/or spaced out.

            I’m ADHD and on the spectrum more than likely, and my therapist says that the cutting edge research pertaining to this is leaning towards combining ADHD and ASD into one conglomerate of symptoms because they overlap more often than not.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        For me it is certain singers that apparently everyone else understands but I cannot without knowing the words ahead of time. Not just mumbling, some voices just don’t register clearly for me if I don’t know what they are saying.

        • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It can depend on the mixing, too. Not just in regards to volume, but also in how the vocals are edited. My recent obsession has been Dusk at Cubist Castle, shit’s absolutely amazing. The way a lot of the vocals are mixed and processed are super cool, like layering the same lines over themselves five times over with subtle delays and panning, it sounds real cool! But it makes it sound a lot more distant to me as a result.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, thst is true. But I’m talking about some popular artists like Pearl Jam and Mase who everyone around me apparently could hear clear as day but I just heard mumble mush at first and could only hear the words clearly with printed lyrics in front of me.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Seems like they could just Google the lyrics and read that.

      But I guess Spotify lyrics do give an idea on the pace of the song.

    • MagnyusG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Deafness isn’t binary, they could be capable of hearing the music but not making out the lyrics.

      • laverabe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Just to clarify definitions that probably wouldn’t be considered deafness, it would be an audio processing disorder. Ability to hear music but inability to process the words.

        Deafness is “binary” in that it just means ones ability to hear sound or not. If you can hear sound even slightly then you just have a hearing impairment and are not deaf.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          No it really isn’t. The hard of hearing are considered deaf. There’s complete deafness, much like there’s complete blindness, but the fact that you’re calling it hearing impairment instead of hard of hearing indicates you aren’t as well versed in Deafness (not to be confused with deafness) as you think

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Similar to blindness which also isn’t an absolute yes or no. People can be blind and still see colors and shapes, but not enough to be able to tell what they are.

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        As someone who is not deaf, this was a really helpful comment to help me understand, thank you.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          To everyone else reading down here, lot of people also don’t really get this same idea with visual impairment and other handicaps.

          There are a lot of people who are legally blind, but that just means they can’t make out things at certain distances, and these are why we need things like high-visibility curbs and street markers and large-type text options and other accessibility features that able-bodied people in a wide field of industries often forget about and just assume either people are blind and won’t be using their products, or will have perfect vision. When really there are far more people who are considered deaf or blind who can still enjoy many of the same things as someone with fully faculties and just need a little extra help.

          I am only typing this out because we seem to entering a strange time in the developed world where more and more people are withdrawing from the social contract and not extending compassion towards others, particularly those with special needs.

          When I was little I thought the future would be a bright and remarkable place where people took care of each other, because those were the messages you see on PBS shows like Mr Rogers and Sesame Street. Turns out, a LOT of people didn’t watch those shows.

          • Anvil Lavigne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            as someone who seems to simultaneously be sensitive to sound & hard of hearing + sharp-eyed & near-sighted, i’d like to thank you for this response.

            e : visual snow is a binch, also.

  • witheyeandclaw@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Search for something called “Spicetify” and make sure to install the marketplace as well for more addons.