The gales of November came early this year.
Look, I don’t agree with the rest of the statement either, but tell me, what is the water touching? Oh, more water? Water is wet.
Tru fax
When water touches water you get more water, not wet water
thats because water is already wet 😂
Water can’t be wet. Wetness is a property that water gives to something else.
like water
Not at all
id argue its the same as saying fire isnt hot, just whatever fire touches becomes hot
And you would be wrong. That is called the Association fallacy.
It threw me at first too. Helps to think of it as wetness being an interaction between a liquid and solid. Water makes things wet, it isn’t itself wet.
So only solids can be wet?
Wetting is a rather complex topic. Basically, yes.
Not all solids can be wetted. Wax, for example: water beads up on a waxed surface; it does not actually wet the surface.
Not all “wetting” involves water. Soldering and brazing involve “wetting” base materials with a molten filler metal. Dripping molten metal on the base material does not necessarily “wet” it either: the molten filler can “bead” just like water on wax. When it solidifies, the filler metal is not bonded to the unwetted base metal.
You’d have to ask a physicist. I would be surprised if you couldn’t make other liquids “wet”. The solid analogy helps with conceptualising an interface, one material on another. I suppose you could make water wet, by freezing a block and then splashing said block with water but that doesn’t equate to it being wet itself, if that makes sense.
wet containing moisture or volatile components
Water is wet. The fact that this is an argument is ridiculous.
Removed by mod
moisture wetness caused by water
water is wet. water contains moisture, because water is moisture.
Or you can go the chemical route, which is so eloquently put by Professor Richard Saykally:
they’d say, “Strong tetrahedral hydrogen bonding!” But that’s the correct answer. That’s what makes water wet.
https://gizmodo.com/what-makes-water-wet-1713082349
Or if you’re more into videos you can watch an entire lecture on it. https://vimeo.com/11854837
Because water is fucking wet.
Removed by mod
Lol literally arguing with a chemist who’s only job was studying water. Yeah I can see where you’re mistaken. Thinking you’re smarter than the professionals.
Removed by mod
Apparently, water also burns
As someone that has experience pouring boiling hot pasta water over my feet I can confirm that it indeed burns.
He can’t even get the order right. The phrase is “[thing] and also water is wet.”
I wish Lake Superior would empregnate me.
Why would you wish that
Cuz I’m so wet.
lake junior
You know what else kills a human? Forcing them to give birth even if they are not healthy enough to do so.
If you are going to make talking points at least be cohesive.
Twitter formatting sucks ass.
Reading order:
4 2 1 3
What ? No, it’s 3 2 4 1
If you’re talking chronological that is
This diagram helps to show that you and Hadriscus agree on the order of the posts, but not on how to describe it. That’s pretty interesting to me.
- 4, 2, 1, 3 – labeling the posts from top to bottom with which order they should then be read. So the first post is read forth, the second post is read second, etc.)
- 3, 2, 4, 1 – listing the order that the posts should be read if they were understood to be labelled in 1-4 top-down. So we should read the third post first, the second post second, forth post third, …
hhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnn
You’re right
The fact that neither can agree on how to describe it yet agreeing on what is so wrong in the first place is just an additional data point on how stupid Twitter numbering is. I find that fascinating.
Exactly haha, they are both arguing the same point because they used different numbering scheme!
The fact that we have gotten this confused is all the evidence I need to change how this works.
Simplest solution is to change the layout from:
- Profile
- Attachments /screenshots / replies
- Text
To
- Attachments /screenshots / replies
- Text
- Profile
I don’t understand
-
if you assign a number 1-4 from top to bottom, reading order is then the indices 3, 2, 1, 4
-
alternatively, if you assign 4, 2, 1, 3 to each element top to bottom, reading order is then 1, 2, 3, 4
different algorithms, same result. i had chatgpt help me out with some fancy ass notation for those interested:
Instructions unclear, dick caught in semi-colon.
-
The formatting on Twitter is what kept me from using it.
Or is it 3 2 4 1
What happened to Edmund Fitzgerald?
Wrecked, 29 died, Lake Superior never gives up her dead
The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
Of the big lake they call Gitchigumee
The lake it is said never gives up her dead
When the gales of November turn gloomy
It got wrecked. Because of that fact, many people are calling for the Great Lakes to be nuked.
I have not until now heard of anyone calling for the Great Lakes to be nuked but I kinda support it. Where do I sign the petition?
That’s the kind of shit Donald Trump would say.
It was one of the robert’s evan but not the movie one
What’s that
There’s a podcast called Behind the Bastards, Robert Evans is the host. Podcast about terrible people in history, Evans and guests have left wing politics and “crude” humor…it’s awesome
Like your mom every Friday night when I come over.
It’s a ship, there’s a whole song about it
Haven’t heard of it
While the music style is not everyone’s cup of tea is an excellent example of a ballad and I think it’s a fun song And well done.
Relevant xkcd
Nice.
Imagine getting murdered by one of the great lakes and it doesn’t involve drowning. 💀
Many people actually die of Cold Shock/hypothermia before drowning!
https://www.wdio.com/weather-news/not-just-the-waves-the-dangerous-cold-of-lake-superior/
Since the latter doesn’t follow from the former, refuting the first point doesn’t automatically refute the second. Nice try, Lake Superior, but you might want to brush up on formal logic.
Well played. Now let’s have the fundy tell us how water covered the earth and drowned everybody but then the world was repopulated. Wait… is there some incest required for that to be true? OH NO!
A little incest, a little beastiality; but who’s counting? I guess not the ones who believe that… because, ya know… they can’t count.
BOOM! WHAT A BURN! FUCKING NAILED IT WITH THAT SCORCHER!
Noah is a Babylonian “deluge myth”. Judaism didn’t even exist until 1,000 years later:
It tells of how Enki, speaking through a reed wall,[v] warns the hero Atra-Hasis (‘extremely wise’) of Enlil’s plan to destroy mankind by flood, telling the hero to dismantle his house (perhaps to provide a construction site) and build a boat to escape
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atra-Hasis
The worship of Yahweh alone began at the earliest with prophet Elijah in the 9th century BCE
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahwism
This means that originally the flood was caused by one god and mankind was saved by another. That’s a better explanation than “God was angry but bipolar, so he saved one family and killed everyone else.”
I see that I have failed at being funny. I’ll try to be better next time
Lolz I laughed and upvoted u
Water is wet because people think water is wet.
Yeah… Neosporin is WAY too weak for this burn. Holy crap hahahahaha
Haloperidol is not strong enough
Well, both were wrong about one thing.
Something something are these nuts fitton in you face…
