Just for the sake of being fair, Steam does do one thing which is anticompetitive; they require publishers don’t sell their games for less than they do on Steam.

If you think about this for a moment you’ll realise it’s in the publisher’s best interest to agree to this.

One of the problems Epic has is that it is only a store front. Steam is a fully featured platform.

Epic, in their lawsuit, wants to break Steam’s store and platform into separate applications, so they can compete.

Sort of like how people want to have different app stores on their iphones.

Difference is: Steam has no restrictions in the first place. You can add non-Steam games to the client if you want. You can use Proton if you want.

Steam offers all of these features for free. What is the point in breaking them apart.

Looks like Please, Don’t Touch Anything on steroids

It’s hilarious to me that Epic will never introduce features like this, and also complain Steam has a monopoly, as if they’re at all comparable

I don’t know how Christians eat the flesh and drink the blood and don’t think anything other than “I’m in a fucking cannibal cult”.

I don’t know how the Christians see this and think anything other than “this is some evil shit”.

Terrerrerreera 5 eva

Diabetes Stranding

**fungeon

Where’s my upstream explicit sync lads

“The veals”

I think they’re called calf’s until they leave the abattoir.

So, where do they go? Do they evaporate? Or something?

Pacific Rim | Winnie the Pooh

Evangelion | Also Winnie the Pooh

It should read:

And if he spins around fast enough his hat will look as if the wojack rolling around is animated.

The other bit of irony is that being the 46th would disqualify him from being the 47th

His hat reads 45-47

That’s wrong. It implies he was the 46th president too.

It should read 45, 47

What a dumbass.

For the uninitiated, to be “ratio’d” means you had more comments than likes.

Because there are no downvotes on Twitter, being radio’d is synonymous with a shit take.

Isn’t this the same argument as “if women can’t have abortions, they will stop having sex”?

Nobody gets married under the assumption they will get divorced. Marriage is supposed to be a gesture of a life long commitment.

On top of that, there are financial benefits to getting married.

I highly doubt this would stop anyone from getting married.

People should stop getting married because it’s a government contract based in religion - it’s gross and I don’t want either of those things being involved in my relationships.

I think “personal choice” comes off as slightly dismissive, as if it’s below your effort to even discuss.

Personally, I just go with “for ethical reasons, plus, its good for the environment” and I’ve never had anyone chuck a a tantrum.

I’m still waiting for my proposal regarding instant orgasm to be classified as sexual assault regardless of whichever animal it’s cast on.

I don’t care how hard it is to breed Panda’s, we can’t just make them nut on command.

I’m not pointing fingers here, we’ve all made our pets seize on the ground for a good twenty minutes or so while we finish the latest episode of Keeping Up with Prostatulus uninteruppted, but we’ve got to do something to stop the fucking apprentices from doing it for shits and giggles, it’s pretty sick when you stop to think about it.

At a bare minimum limit the orgasms to one minute, and necessitate a bodily fluid retention spell. I’m tired of stepping over the puddles when sneaking out the newbloods quarters.