I had an Aspire One D270 laptop with a 32-bit Intel Atom CPU and 1 gigabyte of RAM, so I installed Debian with Xfce on it, but even then it’s running way too slow.

Is there anything I can do to make the laptop faster and more responsive given its limited memory?

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Compile your own kernel for those atom processors and they work much better.

    It’s not hard, there’s a text interface for it where you just pick what to do from a list.

    • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I’ve never compiled my kernel so I’m not familiar with what is happening there, but why could that be faster? Is it only installing drivers for present devices, or what is happening?

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I can’t remember off the top of my head because it’s been a long while, but there’s some weird option inside the configurator that accounts for one of the things the early atom line doesn’t have that the default kernel expects out of x86 or x64 processors.

        Of course, any binary program that was compiled with the expectation of that capacity would also have weird hangs and slowness, but (like I said, a while ago) that didn’t tend to cause a 1.3ghz atom to be slower than a 700mhz pentium m.

  • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    JWM is my suggestion. It’s a window manager that doesn’t require almost any knowledge or key bindings to use and it has all necessary stuff included out of the box afaik. You can also use xdgmenumaker to make the right click/Start menu better.

  • Handles@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Maybe try Openbox instead of XFCE. Can’t promise it’ll add much memory but with 1gb RAM I guess every bit counts?

    Edit: just had a quick look around, and it looks like your machine can be upgraded to a whopping 2gb RAM… It’s still not great, but it is a 100% increase in memory.

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      2 gb memory should make XFCE usable. That’s what my crappy laptop has and XFCE works fine. I use Firefox with a few open tabs and watch YouTube at 720p.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I once swapped a Debian install with XFCE to just running Openbox instead of a full DE and got down to 300Mb or so of memory usage. This was about a decade ago so obviously YMMV but given literally all I did was run Debian with just openbox and no DE, there’s probably additional tuning to be done that can get them to a more usable state

  • kuneho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    If you use mechanical hard drive in it, it worth a try to replace it with an SSD. After that, Debian should run much better.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I acquired an ewaste laptop with an 8 year old celeron, 4GB of memory and a 500GB HDD. I tossed Linux Mint on there as an experiment to see what would work decently on there. Its not great, but its usable and might become my daughter’s first computer. Running firefox its noticably slow but I can crack open Libre Office or ScummVM and other than the initial load time it’s pretty snappy. I kinda forgot how hard drives give systems that slow-then-fast feeling…

      • kuneho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        without any checking of course, I assumed that machine is “new enough” to have some form of SATA in it, but good point

      • infeeeee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can buy IDE m.2 converter. There are usb to floppy converters, usb drive shows up as floppy drive. You can attach modern peripherals to old computers, this kind of retro world with modern and old parts mixed is funny.

        • kuneho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Would it worth, though? I mean, is there a significant difference on IDE between HDD or SSD? With an adapter, SATA speeds on the long run would be bottlenecked by IDE if I’m correct.

          • infeeeee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Yeah, it’s not quick, there is no noticeable difference in speed. Random read should be much quicker. But you can’t really buy ide hdds anymore and they will die sooner or later, and the price of small m.2 sata ssds are falling.

          • Rimu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Still worth it, for the latency elimination alone. But also I expect a SSD would saturate the IDE connection whereas a HDD rarely would.

          • claudiom@blendit.bsd.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I can speak from experience that it is worth it. It won’t be a super speed demon, but it will make it somewhat more usable. I’ve done so with my Asus Eee PC 901 netbook which has the two PATA SSDs. Those SSDs are SUPER slow compared to the cheapest mSATA SSD you can find with more than double the space, and all you need is a MiniPCI-to-mSATA adapter (the Eee PC 901’s drive slots are MiniPCI). I documented all about it here: https://claudiomiranda.wordpress.com/2020/10/04/my-geeeky-experiment-part-3/

            I’m running OpenBSD/i386 on mine which isn’t as fast as something like Linux, but it definitely felt faster even with OpenBSD after the hardware upgrade. I also increased the RAM to 2 GB which is the maximum amount supported.

  • Quantum Cog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have a similar device Intel atom, 1gb RAM. I installed arch and use it as a headless computer (without DE/WM). If I need WM I use sway. Use a minimal browser like Qutebrowser. Although it would also run like shit but better than chrome/firefox.

  • thayer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    If that’s one of those old 10" netbooks, I had good experiences running dwm and xmonad on mine back in the day (had an Acer and later an MSI Wind U120(?)). Typically ran all my apps maximized, one per desktop. Firefox did okay, but this was around 2010-2012. Mostly stuck with terminal apps and it was more than snappy enough.

    Some screenshots for reference…

      • thayer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Me too! I can’t recall now why I parted with it, but I wish I hadn’t. Would love to see what it could do today.

  • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have a similar but dual core Atom netbook. The thing I did was put an SSD into it, and then installing bare Debian. I chose no graphical system from the installer. From there I installed i3 as the window manager and launched it with an automatic login script checking if I was on TTY1.

    That’s all I did, basically keeping the stuff the little thing has to run to an absolute minimum, and a fully fledged desktop environment would have set it on fire.

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can try something like antiX but it won’t do good as a desktop. I use my netbook as a home server with pi-hole in it.