Obviously this won’t work for all sports, but things like football, track, soccer, it would allow for de-gendered team, even allowing athletes with the skills but not the genetically-endowed physical attributes to have a place to play.

Note: I know very little about sports and being on a sports team, so please point out anything that doesn’t make sense.

    • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      For real though, the only sports competitions I’ve been to live in the past decade have been robot sports.

      Why would I pay money to see a human take a ball from another human, when I can pay less to watch a robot shoot flames and saw open another robot gladiator style?!

      • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I mean…

        ‘The word itself derives from the Czech word “robota,” or forced labor, as done by serfs. Its Slavic linguistic root, “rab,” means “slave"’

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Weight is the wrong criteria to use. Why not just have it classed by skill level. Enforce equity in school sports by mandating that a meaningful distribution of skill-based leagues are funded. This seems like a very simple solution to me that would address gender-based inequities in general as well as improve sports overall.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Because even matching skill levels, males have greater strength, endurance, cardiovascular capacity, etc, ad nauseam. They have greater glycogen stores, which means they can perform longer, and they recover faster.

      Growth plates are different, bone density is different. Muscle density and structure is different.

      Just look at the high school boys soccer team that tromped an Olympic women’s soccer team.

      Women have faster reaction times. They have a different/higher pain threshold. They can bear young.

      This is just fundamental biology. Frankly it’s baffling to hear your nonsensical arguments.

      • xenomor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I literally cannot understand the argument that you’re making. People with different physiological characteristics are not going to have the same skill levels. Nothing you listed argues against my proposal. All the physiological advantages that you listed are fine. Some females may be better than some males at some tasks and vice versa. Why not let them compete against each other. Seems like creating a larger pool of competitive athletes would improve any sport. Carving out leagues that cater to different capability levels would open opportunities for more people. I’m proposing that we have more, better, more competitive and exciting sports. What exactly are you objecting to?

        • Kill_John_Lennon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          Oh the pride and joy I will experience when I finally get to be champion in the “Pretty shit” skill level running competition! Especially if I manage to defeat my handicapped neighbor, that prick keeps boasting about how he’s been training hard every day for the past 10 years! I’m not sure you understand what competitive sports are about …

          • xenomor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            We already basically do this with things like the differentiation between Varsity and JV. Not sure why this is such an offensive concept to some of you (just kidding, I’m pretty sure I understand exactly why y’all are offended). If competition is what is great about sports, then excluding some competitive participants because of arbitrary physiological characteristics actively diminishes the sport. But perhaps competition isn’t actually what some of you think is great about sports. I suspect that what some of you actually value about sports is to experience a kind of masterbatory high of seeing someone you can identify with, in shallow ways, achieving things that you yourself cannot.

    • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Ding ding ding, we have a winner.

      (edit to be completely clear: being queer myself, this is not something I am celebrating, just pointing out that you have the correct answer)

    • EGG_CREAM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Unfortunately that’s just not true. There are a ton of people who use this as an excuse to oppress, and fuck them. But pound for pound, a person assigned male at birth is still going to have competitive advantage over someone assigned female at birth.

      I don’t love the way this study words the problem, but I’ll quote it here: “Male physiology cannot be reformatted by estrogen therapy in transwoman athletes because testosterone has driven permanent effects through early life exposure.”[1]

      I really wish it were as simple as it feels like it should be: trans men have the testosterone levels to compete with cis men, and the same for trans women and cis women. It’s really not that simple though, and pretending like the only barrier is hate won’t help things.

      1 - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9331831/

      • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I could train as hard as possible, for years, and I promise you I couldn’t beat a single woman in the WNBA on a 1 on 1 game. I think it is important to remember, that yes, statically, men have an advantage, but each individual is unique. I think it would make more sense 1. Remove the profit motive from sports. 2. Have leagues based on skill, not gender. Of course, that will never happen. Match making in video games is a clear example of how it can work. If I was really into any competitive game, every time I played I’d be playing against people that were roughly equal to me. I suppose that is harder to do in team sports though, especially when there is money involved for the players.

        • Welt@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          I could train as hard as possible, for years, and I promise you I couldn’t beat a single woman in the WNBA on a 1 on 1 game.

          Yeah, but we both know that’s because you’re a short-ass weakling, be honest.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yes each individual is unique. But when you pick the top athletes in the world, you’re not picking a random subset of the population. You’re picking the most extreme examples from the edge of the bell curve.

          At these levels, even a 3% difference in ability can mean the difference between 1st place and 600th. And the differences between men and women are much more pronounced than 3%.

          Just do some research and look at the differences. Serena Williams, best woman tennis player, got absolutely dominated by 203rd male tennis player.

          American women’s soccer team got dominated by a high school boy’s team. It just isn’t there. I know people want to believe all sexes and genders are equal and they should be. But just because they are equal under the law or should receive equal treatment doesn’t mean they are the same

      • Steve@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Im not disagreeing that there is valid science that can sort this out.

        I am saying that the most powerful forces at play are those who just want to fuck with transgender athletes.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m still a fan of just removing all the rules around drugs and bodies. Let’s see what 21st century science can do!

    • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I imagine it would be like The Fast and The Furious where he presses the nitrous button till the screws/bolts all come out and the car falls apart very quickly.

    • noobnarski@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It would be a kinda fun league to watch, but I dont want to hear about athletes dying because they took obscene amounts of steroids to be the best.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        I want to say that because understanding of steroids and sports medicine they could be done in a way to prevent that for many sports. But o also know that would require rigorously enforced regulation which athletes would then try to game, which would probably lead to more deaths on the field.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Fuck that. You wanna go nuts on steroids then shoot up meth and cocaine before a race, go ahead. We’ll put defibrillators every 10m around the track. Catch that dragon, sports person.

          • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            I’d pay to see a feild full of tweakers, put a massive rock on one of those dog race things place random weapons around the track

      • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        We already have racers dying regularly in Isle of Man TT. Blood sports never died, they evolved. Why not sprinkle some steroids over it.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      On average, but there’s outliers.

      Like, there are women out there with higher testorone than the average man, and crazy is a huge factor.

      I played rugby in college and we hung out with the women’s team and drunk coed wrestling was definitely a common thing.

      Every once and a while a non rugby player would think it was just an excuse to roll around with a hot chick, and they would get absolutely demolished. Like I’m not talking about underestimating the woman and losing quickly due to technical skill. Just getting absolutely manhandled by a girl without the socially ingrained fear of violence and pain. Like, I was one of the biggest guys on the men’s team and had wrestling experience, I still lost to some of them. Women almost a foot shorter and that I had more than 50 pounds on. Because they really wanted that W and kept trying till they got it.

      Hell, for two years we had coed practice including full speed tackling and scrimmages. Top end speed was usually the only clear difference, and even then the fastest five players on the field was never all guys.

      • Emerald@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Every once and a while a non rugby player would think it was just an excuse to roll around with a hot chick, and they would get absolutely demolished. Just getting absolutely manhandled by a girl

        The perfect deal if they’re into that

      • Chloë (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Like, there are women out there with higher testorone than the average man

        No, that doesn’t happen, the adrenal glands and ovaries do not produce enough t to reach even very low male levels, testosterone for the most part is produced in the testicules which cis women do not have. that much testosterone would transition a woman into a man, they would grow beard and get a deeper voice, that’s how HRT works for FtMs.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          they would grow beard and get a deeper voice, that’s how HRT works for FtMs.

          Plenty of people with XY chromosomes can’t grow facial and have a high pitched voice well into their 20s or even after

          And plenty of people with XX chromosomes shave/wax/bleach facial hair and have deep voices.

          Hormones aren’t binary, there’s a bunch of different hormones that can be in a lot of different ranges

          And that’s not even getting into the other options besides XX/XY

          Stop trying to make everyone conform to your binary views on gender.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            12 days ago

            He’s not talking about gender he’s talking about sex. Someone born with testicles with XY chromosomes is always going to produce more testosterone than someone born with ovaries with XX chromosomes - assuming both sexual organs are functioning as expected.

            • zbyte64@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              Oh, nice to know that girl who beat me at wrestling was cuz her sexual organs weren’t working properly.

              • kava@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                We’re talking about testosterone in blood not wrestling abilities. A 300lb woman will beat an 110lb man in wrestling. Doesn’t mean she has higher T.

                • zbyte64@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  Amazing how one can dismiss another’s personal experience by simply insisting a different scenario happened.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 days ago

              assuming

              A whole bunch of shit while ignoring all the contex…

              I’m talking about 18-22 year olds and the women are on the women’s rugby team comparing them to men who have never needed to shave and their voice hasn’t cracked.

              If you think every 18-22 year old guys has been thru puberty…

              That’s as ridiculous as not understanding that hight T women would be attracted to high level athletics and then overly represented in elite athletes.

              What you are doing is the equivalent of someone who stops paying attention to science in sixth grade but believes they’re an expert at 47.

              You got the cliff notes version and think people should address you as Doctor.

              Shits a lot more complicated than you think.

              • kava@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 days ago

                A high T woman is 70 ng/dL and that already is starting to imply some sort of adrenal tumor or polycystic ovary syndrome. The normal range is a lot closer to 20~30

                A low T man is ~250 ng/dL and average is around 400~500 ng/dL

                A woman will not have T levels similar to men because they don’t have testicles. Even the highest T females compared to lowest T men.

                The only time this would be true is in 1 in 10 million cases. If that’s your whole argument, then OK. It is theoretically possible if the woman has an adrenal tumor and the man is effectively castrated.

                But for virtually all other cases this simply cannot happen due to human physiology.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  What do you not understand about 18-22?

                  Which, if you haven’t noticed, is still the age range of a lot of Olympians and elite athletes.

                  Hell, some sports average under 18.

                  It’s like you didn’t even read my comment. You’re just fucking insisting everything fits in your nice little division of two piles and no one else can exist.

                  It’s the same line of thinking as transphobes…

                  And I have no desire to ever interact with people stuck in that thinking. And immediately regret trying to help you understand the finer points.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        There was a story on Reddit from a soldier, his squad ended up in a fight with rugby players in a bar in Australia and after the fight they had a drink together and when a soldier told the players they were pretty brave to start fighting people in the army, they replied “the only people we fear is women who play rugby because they’re completely crazy”.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      I remember Serena Williams making a comment that the men can just hit harder and faster. So even a sport like tennis men just have an advantage.

      Having watched some badass girls wrestle dudes and win it’s an up hill battle. Women are typically stronger then men at a young age like single digit age but one puberty hits it’s all off the table.

      Now shooting(archery/firearms) I have seen girls out preform men and it’s a fair sport of accuracy. Also in motor sports women can be competitive there and also have an advantage of being smaller and lighter. Every 100 lbs is a 1/10th a second

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Plus, bears already have an open weight class independent of gender! Now we’re making real PROGRESS

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    If you wanna get answers from a community that’s been training in 1000x earths gravity to fight anti-trans rhetoric, ask this in hexbear.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    or why don’t we just keep everything as is because it’s not a big fucking deal despite what bigots say

    if you really wanted to “fix” or “save” womens sport, just start by fucking paying them the same as men and giving women’s sport the same attention on tv

  • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I had an idea for a fantasy setting where a multiracial society played a lacrosse-like sport, and in order for halflings and dragonkin to be able to play against each other fairly they had a rule about the size and length of your stick being inversely proportional to your height. I’ve always felt like we could get something similar going for a lot of other sports to put top-level athletes off different sexes and body types on the same level and have it purely come down to skill - and non-contact sports honestly have no excuse not to experiment with their rules in this way.

    • olafurp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah, if one height/weight class gets dominant that class should be nerfed like in every competitive esport

  • Leviathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Testosterone level AND weight. Wait til they find out what happens when you’re on hormone blockers.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    What sports would it work in? Do you think people will care about the best tennis player that weighs 140 pounds? The best 240 pound soccer players? The fastest 130 pound swimmer? No one wants to watch any of that. It barely works for boxing.

    All that aside from the fact that you’re still pretty much ruining competitive sports for most cis women by doing it. The reason there’s a female “insert sport here” competitive league to begin with is so many women have a reason to compete and can win. A 150 pound trained athlete will still wipe the floor with a 150 pound female athlete. It’s far, far, from just a weight thing. The Williams sisters were the best female tennis players the world knew, and they went out and proved they couldn’t beat a man that was ranked over 200th. The world champion austrailian female soccer team couldn’t beat a boys highschool team. The fastest woman to ever run the 1500m did it in 3:49. A 5’ 9" guy did it in 3:26.

    Weight and size is only a little portion of physical differences.

    If there’s so many Trans athletes, why don’t they just have a category of their own?

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      If there’s so many Trans athletes, why don’t they just have a category of their own?

      Because there aren’t, and this whole thing is much ado about nothing.

      But hey, it keeps the morons distracted and voting, so that’s a plus.

    • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      It isn’t that there’s tons of trans athletes… It’s that even at fairly low levels of sport there are currently more options available to people with disabilities to participate then there are of people of intersex and trans backgrounds. In a lot of cases tracking performances of trans athletes they aren’t dominating. There’s stories of transfem athletes who regularly sit around getting 15th place but after coming in first one time the entire sporting becomes hostile to trans people.

      In civil rights discussions there’s a concept of rights of participation. The concept being that being barred from social, political or recreational spheres creates outsized harms on the ability to make the advantageous connections others are given free access to and creates classes of segregation.

      There’s also a catch 22 situation. If someone opts to go through a trans puberty instead of a natal one there is no meaningful difference to speak of between the physicality of trans athletes and cis ones. If forced to stay inside their original sex segregated sport not only are trans people being being told in no uncertain terms that society does not accept their new status regardless of parity, they essentially become isolated inside the sporting body. Either you have someone whose body is feminine placed in a sport with only cis males to be compared to or you have a masculine body placed inside a group with all cis women and both will be framed out of being taken at all seriously inside the entire body of that sport. A lot of trans people can’t participate in sport not because they aim to be picked for any of the social leg ups excellence in sport provides… But for any of the regular benefits of just participating.

      It creates a fair sting to have a government force your choice of initial puberty that neither you or your doctors and parents thought was a good idea… and then sit back and watch the rest of society constantly punish and isolate you for going through that puberty by then treating you as a logistical social problem for the rest of your life.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Honestly, once they’ve gone through HRT, nearly all, if not all the advantages given by their sex are reversed. I’m not sure how well that works for the F>M athletes, but the M>F athletes are the ones where HRT not working properly would be a problem, and they’re the ones that would unbalance things if not properly transitioned.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Except that isn’t true. Men are more stable due to hip width, their hearts move more blood, their arms and hands are larger/longer, and their lungs hold more air. None of that goes away.

  • Gamers_Mate@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I could see this working better than the current system and would undermine bigots argument about an unfair advantage. Though there are people that think being transgender gives people an advantage in chess somehow.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Women (and trans women) naturally carry a higher body fat percentage than men (Incl trans men) a “male” athlete can more safely and more easily carry a lower body fat % and therefore more muscle per kilo. So the weight classes wouldnt be able to be 1:1 if you wanted a level playing field.

      There is still the inherent biological advantage in being born male and going through male puberty and developing a male muscular/skeletal system before transitioning. Very difficult to rule around every nuance of this though.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Testosterone is literally a PED.

        Its why trans women can compete at a decent level, they’ll still rarely be at the absolute top of their sport.

        They have to have their testosterone and other hormones monitored and held to average levels. That will always put them at a disadvantage at elite levels versus women who don’t have the same requirement.

        There is still the inherent biological advantage in being born male and going through male puberty and developing a male muscular/skeletal system before transitioning

        Which is completely solved by access to puberty blockers before transitioning.

        I did see some article claim that hip to knee ratio didn’t translate to athletic performance, and it was so ridiculous I even downloaded the linked PDF that said it was a study, and it was just a pamphlet repeating the exact same claim with no further source.

        I mean, there’s a clear correlation already with women’s sports already. Lots of runners peak early and have worse times by graduating highschool. But it’s literally physics. Wider hips just means less efficient running.

      • JesterIzDead@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        This is exactly right and what many people fail to understand. In studies, even after 3+ years of hormone therapy, trans-women still have significantly more muscle tissue than CIS women.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          And that’s without looking at cardiovascular differences, or even as subtle as glycogen storage.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          I mean, the average person is obeese these days…

          Transitioning is a huge dedication to making their appearance fit with their identity, it just seems common sense for them to take more pride in their new appearance

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Your last sentence made me search up women’s chess… and it exists! That sound like a bold assumption or assertion that women are dumber in chess… Like what? I don’t know why chess has to be gender divided. Maybe it exist to increase representation of women in it but the idea seems stupid. Maybe they have to split it for trans too if its already divided for cis women.

  • Welt@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Nobody’s making the obvious suggestion to chemically sterilise all athletes.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      The Castrati League has entered the stadium!

      I know… i know…castrato were young boys castrated to keep their singing voices high… . but words can be updated and language fluid… right?

      • nefonous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        12 days ago

        Castrato is just Italian for castrated or neutered, even used with animals albeit mostly used referring to males. Sometimes it’s even used figuratively. It would still work perfectly with your example, I think

  • inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    When I was thinking about it, I came to the conclusion that sports that don’t require confrontation should just evolve and give up on the competitiveness. Swimming, javelin, whatever shouldn’t have the winner be the best out of every contestant, we should celebrate each and everyone’s force of will to better themselves first. We already have that with high jumping, where individual performance is rated Vs their height goal.

    Give up competitiveness in sports where it isn’t needed, and you no longer have people melting down because someone has more muscular mass, or a different gender than expected.

    Give up competitiveness in sports and you return to a celebration of the human body and it’s physical prowess, instead of childishly fighting for who’s best.

    Obviously this doesn’t work in football, or sports with direct confrontation, that i haven’t found a solution yet, maybe during the next shower ?