• whoareu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    In my opinion this setting should be set by the use. Whether they want their votes to be shown to public. If they deny Lemmy would just show “upvoted by anon” or something.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Generally speaking, you shouldn’t do anything on the internet that you absolutely don’t want to become public. If you don’t want people to know your votes, don’t vote.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    It would be nice to be able to have a view that only tallies the votes from your local server, but IDK about listing all the individuals in an easily accessible manner.

    What I really want though is a rolling deletion of my activity that’s older than 3-6 months. I understand there’s no way to erase these things entirely, especially from decentralized servers, but I do wish the internet could revert to being a little more ephemeral. You can also go look through public records and go back years in real life, but it’s not easy.

  • RagingHungryPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    While I don’t necessarily think that votes should be made public, it would be nice if you could see your own votes. There have been a few times I wanted to find a post that I had seen, but didn’t save, and I couldn’t find it.

  • DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Have you SEEN the drama that happens in this place? I feel like this is just asking for weird nobodies to harass anyone who quietly disagrees with them.

    If this passes then I’m outta here.

  • DaGeek247@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Probably for the best if downvotes remain less easy to access, at the very least. There’s a myth that people who are suicidal will “find a way even if you take away some of the easier methods”, which is explicitly false. If you take away the easy option, you are directly reducing the harm that easy option might have caused. https://gizmodo.com/why-have-people-stopped-committing-suicide-with-gas-5959303

    If the admins take away the quick and easy option for seeing who downvoted your passionate comment, the mods are directly reducing the number of people who go on rants about downvotes and targeted vitriol.

    It has nothing to do with privacy; this is a public forum that by it’s very nature, requires that all activity be easily available to all the sites you federate with. There is not privacy in that.

    This is about the type of community that forms around the software. Do we want to encourage, and make easily available, the list of people who disagree with you? Or do we want to to put minor barriers around that to help keep the number of people who do that low?

  • Vieric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    absolutely a horrible idea. please for the love of god don’t do this, it will only lead to people getting dunked on for how they upvote/downvote.

  • auzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Already had one person today mention my down votes .

    It didn’t validate their argument at all and without context it can be interpreted in any fashion to make it seem malicious