What are your favorite sites you visit daily, besides Lemmy?

    • tyrant@lemmy.world
      0·
      11 days ago

      I’ve been wanting to get back into rss feeds. Have a good feeder? Reader? Compiler? What are the clients even called? I’m drawing a blank…

  • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
    0·
    10 days ago

    Blackgate.com - the remnants of Black Gate magazine, which was published from 2000-2011 and then continued in digital form since. It focuses primarily on vintage literary fantasy, though occasionally the an article will be published in films or new fiction. Of particular note to nerds is the Cinema of Swords column by Lawrence Ellsworth, who fantasy fans may be familiar with as the Principal Narrative Designer for Baldur’s Gate 3. I’m not so immersed in the fantasy world that I understand most of what is discussed on the blog, but it is a nice taste of the old Internet, one which might resonate with other fediverse users.

  • pipe@lemmy.world
    0·
    11 days ago

    Here’s a few! While I mostly use the RSS feeds from these sites, I often read the web versions too:

    • Hack a Day, wonderful place to get clued into ground-up explorations of technical topics from the outside
    • BBC News, good for a world perspective that’s not fully US-centric but still in English
    • OSNews, Operating System news for nerds like me who get legitimately excited for things like installing plan9 on bare metal
    • Ken Shirrif’s Blog, the paragon of long-form teardown & explanation of vintage electronics, deeply insightful, terrifyingly technical but still approachable. Okay, not a daily update, but worth the wait
    • Create Digital Music, solid and considered electronic music instrument news and articles, for us unreformed synthesizer geeks
  • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
    0·
    11 days ago

    • lemmy.today. I like their “we aim to try to not defederate with other instances” policy, and they’re geographically near me.

    • Kagi. Search engine that doesn’t log or data-mine users; it charges a subscription fee. Does some neat things like specifically index and allow searching of the Fediverse. It works fine, but that’s not really my interest: I really just don’t want to have a search engine provider logging and data-mining my searches, and I’m happy to finally have an option to avoid that.

    • Wikipedia. Being the “store of all human knowledge” may be ambitious, but Wikipedia’s been having a pretty good go at it, and has killed off most commercial encyclopedias.

    Stuff that I don’t use daily, but do probably have a good chance of having used in a given week:

    • Google Earth. There’s no real alternative to this out there: it sucks in a lot of satellite and aerial imagery to let one get some degree of 3d view of much of Earth. Also convenient for measuring distances, including multi-hop trips.

    • Amazon. The world’s largest retail selection and is available wherever you live. Twenty years back, one significant argument for living in or near a city was shopping choice. Amazon provides a much larger selection all over. Maybe for some of the younger crowd, that doesn’t seem like a big deal, and it’s a change that didn’t happen overnight, but the change over time is pretty remarkable. I don’t buy everything from them – Walmart.com provides better delivery options for food and some other things that they sell, Monoprice.com has long been my go-to provider for computer cables (which have historically seen obscene markups at brick-and-mortar retail), and I used to use Newegg for their better product database. Aside from the constant nagging to subscribe to Amazon Prime, I’m pretty happy with them.

    • YouTube. It’s the world’s largest provider of on-demand video. Not only that, but for a lot of non-fiction stuff, it’s a lot better than any commercial streaming service. I don’t subscribe to their premium service, though I would if I could get a “no log, no analytics” guarantee of the sort that Kagi provides.

    • Maybe Tineye. Image-keyed index of images: feed it an image or URL of an image, and it will tell you where it’s seen it, including the earliest time and the best-quality version of the image. It uses fuzzy matching, so it’s capable of identifying similar images with certain kinds and levels of modification. There’s no alternative for figuring out where some images may have come from or digging up less-overly-compressed version of images. I’m surprised that some of the image search providers – which have to build an image index as well – haven’t provided this feature.

    Stuff that I used to use daily:

    • Reddit. I was kind of sad when they transitioned to the new Web UI, but kept using the old one. But killing off the third-party clients was the breaking point for me.

    • Yahoo, then Altavista, then Google. Main search engines. Altavista in particular indexed Usenet for a while, and I believe that Google was the first search engine to introduce image search, which was nice.

    • Slashdot. Before Reddit. Didn’t have Reddit’s variety in topics and wasn’t designed to scale up to what Reddit or the Threadiverse are, but it was a good forum for a while. I do prefer Markdown to Slashdot’s HTML subset, though.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      0·
      11 days ago

      I really just don’t want to have a search engine provider logging and data-mining my searches, and I’m happy to finally have an option to avoid that.

      Aw, c’mon! Have some fun with your searches. Confuse the hell out of google!

      “Boy eating family of lions.”

      “Is Peter Parker Batman’s brother in law?”

      “MARCO!”

      “Ghostbusters all female cast”

      “1989 time travelling masturbation”

      “If we aim our kelbasas at steam train”

      “Is my size Barbie trying to kill me?”

      “Romancing the table.”

      “Home buyers guide to floor pizza”

      “Imagining yesterday”

      “Does Bruno Mars is gay?”

      “Eek! The cat. Rule 34.”

      “Will Sasso scented laundry soap”

      “Happy ninjas go boom”

      Really you can make ANY random bullshit up. And google will have to go through one by one and edit or alter their data. Otherwise their AI bots will sound INSANE

      “polo…”

    • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
      0·
      9 days ago

      I like their “we aim to try to not defederate with other instances” policy, and they’re geographically near me.

      Out of curiosity, what is it about this policy you like?

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    0·
    11 days ago

    Honestly it’s difficult to say. But it would probably be some kind of cybersecurity and privacy advocacy website that call out companies and how, not only they exploit our private information for profit, but also how that information can be used against you at any point in your life, especially if a government implements a law that infringes on personal rights and freedoms and suddenly your find yourself guilty of something. These companies will gladly hand over that information to the law forces and then you’re fucked.