• Luci@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is it too much to ask for an app that just does one single thing. Everything doesn’t need to be an advertising platform.

    • moontorchy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Interesting to observe how our intuition is failing us while dealing with digital products. When someone gives you something for free on the street, naturally you get suspicious and start asking yourself “where is the catch?” But when there’s a free app - no second thought. Everyone is using it so it must be ok. Well, Google and Facebook are nothing but glorified advertising agencies. The whole reason of their existence is to make money on ads. Edited: typos.

      • Luci@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The only line I care about is the line that takes me from A to B

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Google is definitely turning into IBM where they just exist because of inertia and not because of anything they actually produce.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is it too much to ask

      Are you willing to deliver them consequences if they don’t do it the way you want?

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not to defend Google, but it seems unclear right now if this is something that will happen while driving, or similar to something Waze already does.

    • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      In Virginia, at least, it’s not a meaningful distinction.

      There used to be an exception for GPS, but the state changed the law a few years ago so that any non-hands-free use of a phone in a non-parked is a ticketable offense. Swiping away an ad at a red light would technically be illegal.

        • soratoyuki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Anecdotal, but a friend of mine was ticketed for it within the first week it went into effect. She (understandably) assumed that being stopped at a stop light was acceptable. That said, I’m not aware of any enforcement since then and wouldn’t be surprised if they deliberately only enforced it right after it took effect.

          Still wouldn’t risk it, though.

    • digger@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m honestly surprised it’s taken them this long. They bought Waze in 2013. I feel like Waze has been doing this kind of ad for at least that long.

    • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Waze has popped up ads on me plenty of times while I’m driving. Yes it knows I’m driving, the map is still scrolling along my route. At one point it was bad enough that the ads were remaining after every stop light, and finally clearing about half way to the next light. I haven’t seen it happen in awhile though, maybe they finally got it fixed.

  • Blue0x@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The moment this starts happening to me, I’m going to start giving every single sponsored stop I see a 1 star review.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I get the feeling, but if the business has no say in getting recommended, aren’t you just punishing businesses that may not even know this program exists? That would suck for very small businesses.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Google isn’t going to promote small businesses that have no say. Google isn’t putting these ads up for fun. They do it because businesses pay them to.

      • Skankboot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s an ad, not a recommendation. As far as I know, Google doesn’t just serve ads for businesses that don’t pay for them.

    • HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Excellent idea. I give gas stations that play lots video ads one star and don’t go back. I give placed that ask for a tip when I do a to go order 1 star as well

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unfortunately not, and the time estimates are quite inaccurate. Sigh, it’s the price for not having to deal with Googles shit

        • akilou@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          But at that point what are you even gaining? If you’re looking for privacy you’re just trading Google tracking you for “third party service provider” tracking you

          • infeeeee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            No. It means they get the data from somewhere else, maybe from some carsharing app, or from some government db from car counting thingies mounted on traffic lights, etc. There are other sources to get traffic data ftom, but usually following users is more convenient and reliable

            They wont tell us where they get it from, they only say it’s not generated via this app. They are followimg someone, but not me.

        • BadlyDrawnRhino @aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thanks for this, I’m going to try this out on my way home. My main use for Gmaps is to determine the quickest way to and from work during peak hour, so keen to see how Magic Earth’s traffic data compares.

          • KISSmyOS@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            the quickest way to and from work during peak hour

            Everyone is using Google for that, so on average, traffic on all alternative routes will level out quickly and it doesn’t matter which one you choose.

        • Salix@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          They get the traffic data from some third party, not by following their users like gmaps.

          https://www.magicearth.com/faq-en/

          Do you share data with third parties?

          We send position data to our traffic provider to generate real-time traffic information. The data is anonymized on the phone, using a changing key (so it’s not linked to you), and it is deleted after 5 minutes.

          They have a good privacy policy though. I haven’t really had many issues with their app.

    • xep@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Is there any way I can help contribute public transport information to OSM? It’s the one thing that Google maps does that I can’t replace.

      • explore_broaden@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I don’t like how OsmAnd limits the number of maps you can download for free, Organic Maps’s donation model is much better in my opinion.

      • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Organic Maps is fine. It’s what I use, although I am not located in a great area for OSM. Are there any specific benefits to OSMand?

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Personally I been using organic maps because Osmand isn’t giving me better directions and it needs more permissions and it doesn’t have working voice directions

      • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Osmand would be the best one if it wasn’t so slow. Compared to organic maps the rendering lag is not only noticeable but very annoying

  • jumjummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Apple Maps sure had a rough start back in the day, but I will always use that over Google/Waze. It’s just so much better now and no worries about this type of junk.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Apple Maps fuckin sucked ass at first, now it hasn’t failed me in years.

      You’re completely right. I won’t use any other map thing now.

      RIP MapQuest

      • seathru@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Google appears to have borrowed this ad format from Waze, which has delivered similar ads for quite some time.

        OsmAnd is getting there tho.

        • skizzles@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Really? I’ve never actually noticed one.

          Maybe because of the ad blocking stuff I use on my phone.

          • camr_on@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I will say that I’ve noticed less ads lately than I have in the past, so it may have been toned down after some backlash. I will start using openstreetmap only in the near future though, I can’t stand this type of thing

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m willing to pay for an ad-free version. Google maps are very useful. I don’t need it to be free. But ads are poison.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Interesting, you don’t think they make enough off your data already? I’m sure I’m not alone in saying I will never pay google a single cent for anything they have to offer, ever.

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        There is no such thing as making “enough” money under the chicago-school dominated business thought. A business should always make as much money as it can for its investors, always. A friend who read Friedman’s works says that the Friedman doctrine makes room to say that a wise business will optimize investor outcomes by investing in its product, workforce, and other smart long-term choices, but in practice, nobody ever reads that deep into the Friedman doctrine. It’s just “philosophical” license to make (and demand, on the part of investors) the shallowest slash-and-burn business decisions possible to make line go up NOW. I will accept arguments about how it’s capitalism, but I’d like to point out that we experienced a very distinct culture shift in business leadership starting around the time that Chicago school thought became all the rage.

          • slaacaa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Exactly. I would be happy to pay for a privacy-focused version of these products, but those doesn’t exist. You can pay facebook to not show you ads, but they never promise to stop harvesting your data, so you would be actually just paying them twice, no thanks, as much as I hate ads.

            The EU needs to step up and start regulating data more. Every person should be the legal owner of their data. Meaning not just personal data, but also data synthesized from their behaviour (it is illegal to follow me in a cat during the day and take photos of my activities without my permission, the same should be the case in the digital world). And every person should have a right to sell the rights to collect and use this data, but it shouldn’t be mandatory for the usage of any app. So you could decide to keep your data private, and pay a monthly fee to use apps like navigation, or social media, or you could decide to give access to your data, and use these apps for free.

        • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Me too. Problem is, that’s not an option. They’re taking your data regardless, so if you pay them, you’re paying them to take your data.

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I have an iPhone and while I don’t like Apple Maps, I will absolutely switch to it in a heartbeat if this is added.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve preferred Apple Maps for a few years now, Googles used to be top of the game but it’s fallen off while Apple’s have IME improved

      • howlingecko@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Same here. I have been happy with Apple Maps.

        I was an early adopter for Waze and helped them build and fix their maps. I loved Waze. Several months after Google bought Waze, I repeatedly noticed battery draining faster and location was more frequently being used by Waze. I wrote to them about it. After some time passed and no response or change, I ditched them.

    • torsday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s gotten so much better. Once they brought offline maps I made the full switch.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Siri, why are we back at the adult book store?

    Bob, based on you browsing history, this is the place you are most likely to visit on a daily basis at 7 am before work…

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Google, tell me how to get to this place”

    “Here are your directions, including a McDonalds break! You deserve a break today, with a delicious tiny BIG MAC being sold for 400% of what it was 5 years ago, at 50% the size.”

    “…when did the movie idiocracy go from being a mockumentary to a documentary?”

  • Wiz@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Just a reminder about the open-source OpenStreetMap. You can improve it online by adding features like a Wikipedia for maps. You can even use the gamified app StreetComplete to add stuff and get points for walking around and mapping.