Did he do it for the memes?

  • Ifera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Damn, I sort of feel like saying “Thank fuck he isn’t president of MY country”, but then I remember how even my local covidiots felt validated by the giant cheese puff, and how Trump is offering carte blanche to companies, for them to pillage and destroy the living conditions of the whole world.

    All I can do is shake my head, hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I remember when Biden was picked as Obama’s VP, and everyone laughed because he’s known to make gaffes like this.

    Obviously, there’s a lot of scrutiny on him, but let’s not pretend it’s all because he’s too old. It’s just Biden being Biden, and while he’s probably too old for the job, that’s what happens when you don’t impose upper age limits…

    • Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s not just “biden being biden” by a longshot. He is 81 and significantly worse.

      We are rightly worried he’s going to lose against trump.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          People aren’t going to vote for Trump over Biden, they are just going to sit out. America doesn’t have mandatory voting.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            If those people are fine with Trump being president, then that’s on them. Sitting out instead of voting against Trump is helping Trump win.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              You can blame them if you want, but the original push is from Biden and the DNC’s failures and support for genocide.

              The point is, Biden is tanking, so swapping him is better. Defending Biden hurts his chances.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                support for genocide

                The same genocide that Trump supports, likely more than Biden?

                If the genocide in Palestine was someone’s single issue, they’d be pretty disappointed if Trump were making decisions about the Palestine…

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  People aren’t voting for Trump, they just won’t for Biden. America isn’t a mandatory voter country, so actively contributing to genocide hurts the DNC’s chances by disengaging voters, not by flipping them to Trump.

              • rekorse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                “Excuse excuse excuse, I feel bad voting for Biden so I won’t”

                Very inspiring. What other emotions do you have trouble dealing with?

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s impossible to dintinguish when Trump makes mistakes from when he’s genuinely lieing or confidently incorrect.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          His voting base doesn’t care if they’re led by an unfit leader.

          Be better than them.

          • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The top comment in this thread is “yeah Biden might be a vegetable, but vote blue no matter who.”

            How exactly are lefties any better? Your leader is losing his mind, clearly not fit to lead the country, but you’ll back him anyway.

            • Deceptichum@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Biden and the Dems are right wing?

              Leftists don’t support them. “Centrists” do.

          • otp@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The choices are

            • Be “better” and help Trump win, or
            • Help Trump lose

            Seems like an easy choice to me.

            • FilthyHookerSpit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Even as a vegetable, Biden’s administration wouldn’t let the country fall into a kleptocracy. And that’s enough for me.

              • hark@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Letting the country fall into a kleptocracy is exactly what Biden and his democratic party handlers are doing with their insistence of “nothing would fundamentally change” by pushing through the weakest presidential candidates and placing the status quo over actual progress.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              It is not nearly so binary. This issue is complex and intertwining - think rocket science where to get more thrust you need more fuel, but adding more fuel adds more weight, so you need even more thrust… that’s mere child’s play compared to politics.

              For one thing, replacing Biden now may help Trump win, but it may also help Trump lose, whereas in contrast NOT replacing Biden now may help Trump lose, or it could help Trump win.

              And somehow, we’re all back to everything Everything, EVERYthing being all about Trump, all the time.:-( Democracy has had cracks in it forever, especially when mixed with capitalism, and he exposes all of those.

              • otp@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                The voters can’t replace Biden, and as I’ve mentioned in another comment, they’re not making these decisions blindly. They’ve likely come to the conclusion that replacing Biden would cost more votes than it’d gain. Right or wrong, they’re not going in blindly.

                All the voters can do is vote. And realistically, on election day, a vote not made for Biden is a vote in Trump’s favour.

                If you’re okay with that, that’s your decision. But I believe Trump has said that if it were up to him, the genocide would’ve been “completed” by now.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  All the voters can do is vote.

                  And protest, and contact representatives, and organize, and join their local party… Again with the national party lines meant to make people disengage.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The general election isn’t for another four months. That is the time to STFU and vote. Although who are we kidding, >90% of people live somewhere where their votes barely matter if at all - maybe, maybe helping Trump voters see that Biden’s re-election is “real”, but otherwise every city will vote Dem and every rural area will vote Repub and there’s like 10 counties that will determine the course of the entire world for the foreseeable future. Btw I’m not worried about either me or you, but I am worried about the independents in those 10 counties.

                  Our news media is out for blood, like sharks in the water. Right or wrong, or left or whatever, they don’t care, they smell PROFIT to be made by ruthlessly making fun of every tiny thing that Biden will do from now on. We ignore this at our peril - I’m not saying that I take evil glee from this horrid fact, merely that this inconvenient truth should be accounted for. We can bow before facts, or we can be crushed by them in turn - but either way, we will have to reconcile with them. The choice is whether we do so before, and use them to turn the situation to our advantage as best we can, or whether we wake up some day later wishing that we had done so previously. Exactly like 2016 with Hillary, or like that other time with RBG, but this time there will be no second chances, bc this at least looks to be our last election. Maybe second to last, possibly with yet another interspersal of another Dem, but there are no guarantees for such - Trump has already declared his intentions to become a dictator, and SCOTUS has already made it legal for him to do so.

                  And in the midst of all of this, with the stakes higher than they’ve ever been for our little democracy experiment… Biden, well, “has a cold”. Okay then, so hype up on crack, cocaine, or whatever you need to do, just get it done, or move aside and let Gavin Newsom or Pete Buttigieg or AOC or Gretchen Whitmer or whoever take the lead. This is not the time to be playing authoritian games with our literal democracy at stake. BuT hE’s OuR lEaDeR? Then LEAD. He’s old - it’s not his fault, but the Democratic primary choosing him would be our fault.

                  I agree that they had some kind of strategy in place. It relied on deception. It failed. Now that the cat is out of the bag, and we all saw what has been happening with our very own eyes and heard it with our very own ears, the strategy of telling everyone “he’s fine, you don’t see it but behind closed doors everything is totally fine, I totally have a girlfriend, you don’t know her bc she goes to another school, in fact she’s in Canada, but we are totally happy together… t-t-totally, yeah!” - this approach (!?!), is backfiring.

                  People are tire of being lied to. They won’t vote. Trump now has a greater likelihood of winning. That’s… no bueno.:-( Maybe we should do something about it? Something other than simply saying “what are you going to do?”, before it’s too late and nothing is all that can be done, as it gets even later in the game. It might be time to update the strategy, to fit the new set of updated facts. Otherwise, we roll the dice and hope for the best - but now is our last chance to affect change, if we really do want to see Trump not win?

                • hark@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  The voters couldn’t even practically choose anyone other than Biden in that sham of a primary. People were warning about Biden since long before the primary and yet democratic party leadership decided they knew better than the voters and forced him through. Now you’re blaming their fuck up on voters.

              • hogmomma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                replacing Biden now may help Trump win, but it may also help Trump lose, whereas in contrast NOT replacing Biden now may help Trump lose, or it could help Trump win.

                Either that quote doesn’t really mean anything, or maybe I’m missing the nuance to it.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Both action or inaction may either increase or lessen the likelihood of either outcome. Hence why politics is more complex than rocket science - think quantum entanglement.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              No. This is an either/or fallacy the DNC has been pushing for over a year to quell any dissent. Well the chickens have come home to roost. We can apply pressure to change the candidate. That’s an option. We do not have to have either Trump or Biden and nothing else.

              • irreticent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s interesting to see all the pro-Trump accounts suddenly change their talking points to “Biden should step down.” It makes you wonder…

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Oh joy. That’s a new one. Nobody has ever called me a pro Trump person for attempting to remind people that there are other options. Never before.

                  Just kidding. This is exactly how we got here. People like you bullying anyone that dares talk about Biden having electability issues. It was too effective and now we’re in this dumb position that could have been avoided so easily.

    • nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a concern because Putin, Xi, Khamenei, Kim… They’re all well-spoken. They’re all quick-witted.

      What kind of message does that send would-be American allies in Asia, in the Middle East, in Africa, in South America?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Um… let me be clear. My former VP pick has always sucked. He’s not old. He’s simply got a head full of busted marbles and wasn’t employable anywhere outside of the US Senate. That’s why I endorsed him to run in 2020. You people disgust me. You deserve what you get.”

        • Asifall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          True, but I feel like people have been talking past each other about this.

          On the one hand, you have people saying Biden’s cabinet would do a better job than Trump, which is true. On the other hand, you have people saying Biden is going to lose to trump unless he somehow makes a dramatic turnaround in the next couple months, which is also true according to all available data.

          The real question isn’t whether Biden is better than trump, it’s whether Biden would serve the country better by stepping down.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Exactly. Biden is a lost cause electorally, regardless of how good or bad he is, because he has tanked his approval with his own voterbase. Nobody is going to see Biden and then vote for Trump, they would just sit out or vote third party. Biden is just handing the win to Trump.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Nobody is going to see Biden and then vote for Trump,

              I am not so certain of that. Granted the numbers would be low, but given how the Electoral College works, the entire election may hinge upon precisely that.

              We’ve been down this road before, in both of the previous elections.

          • OpenStars@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Except that’s not the real question, bc he’s already said that God Himself could not cause Biden to step down (I’m being literal here). He’s doubling, tripling, and whatever more down, digging his heels in and refusing to even consider that option, regardless of who asks.

            At this point he is either removed by force - which won’t happen - or it’s already over.

            And either way, the SCOTUS ruling holds firm.

            I wish him luck, but I don’t expect good things to come. Even if he wins, heck even if he like rigged the election at this point and gave himself a large majority of numbers in the process, the other side won’t believe it and there’s a goodly chance of an actual civil war, or something along those lines (bad riots or such). Or maybe I’m full of shit, but it bothers me so much that everything that I say sounds “fatalistic” to my own inner ear - except that word means closing your eyes to the truth and choosing to believe only the worst, whereas this is my attempt to be realistic with eyes wide open!? I am saying that it does not bode well that this seems a realistic possibility rather than hyperbolic exaggeration of words for like comedic effect:-(.

            Once again, there’s like ~11% of the country who is die-hard Trump red maga, another ~11% Biden blue maga, and the LARGE majority of us in the middle don’t matter in the slightest as we get caught between these two extremes (Russian oligarchy encroachment vs. American oligarchy establishment, tbf the latter cares far more about the common folk, but is really bad at showing that).

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          as Jon Stewart also pointed out, but that’s not the issue here. the issue is expected performance. people expect want one of them to be a crazy loon. the other not so much. so when he acts like he’s not all there people are concerned whether he can perform well enough at the election to defeat the fascist. the polls aren’t optimistic.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      So I should be able to look at 2020 debate footage and compare it to 2024 debate footage without a problem right?

      Right?!?

      This isn’t just gaffes. The man is getting to an age where this stuff get harder every year. There’s a reason the military has a mandatory retirement age of 62, even if you have a desk job.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      He immediately caught and corrected himself on the Putin gaffe, saying his enemies have been on his mind lately… Didn’t do so with the Trump gaffe.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Apparently he’s always struggled with speech issues, and grew up being mocked for his stuttering, which he learned to cover with his own techniques/efforts.

          Here’s a video of him discussing this in a TV interview from 15 years ago.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUFA6JUaAPY

          So it doesn’t appear to be anything new for him.

          • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Let’s stop equating this stuff to stuttering. It’s not stuttering. I wish it were stuttering.

            Head in the sand mentality is just going to get us a dictatorship in the presidency. I don’t know what it takes for us to realize that we have to do something about this problem. It isn’t going to be enough to just say

            “Well, maybe he’ll get elected anyway.”

            • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Biden’s reputation for gaffes is something you clearly weren’t aware of:

              The remark revived Biden’s reputation for gaffes.[227][221][228]

              Those sources are from 2009.

              Journalist and TV anchor Wolf Blitzer has called Biden loquacious;[692] journalist Mark Bowden has said that he is famous for “talking too much”, leaning in close “like an old pal with something urgent to tell you”.[298] He often deviates from prepared remarks[693] and sometimes “puts his foot in his mouth”.[169][694][695] Biden has a reputation for being prone to gaffes[696] and in 2018 called himself “a gaffe machine”.[697][698] The New York Times wrote that Biden’s “weak filters make him capable of blurting out pretty much anything.”[169]

              Now you do.

              • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Fantastic quality for a man in his 80s running for President.

                And it’s worse. This is not normal. We won’t win pretending it’s normal.

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Didn’t it take like a good five seconds before he corrected himself? I wouldn’t say that was “immediately”.

        • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          All the same, according to his Wikipedia page, he’s been known for such gaffes his whole career, the first mention of such is from 2009, as VP for Obama. So it’s not a new phenomenon for him.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    He did pick up on the Putin gaffe and immediately corrected himself and explained that his enemies have been on his mind lately.

    He didn’t correct calling Kamala Harris Trump.

    He’s been known for making gaffes since he was Obama’s vice president. From his Wikipedia page:

    The remark revived Biden’s reputation for gaffes.[227][221][228]

    Those sources are from 2009.

    Journalist and TV anchor Wolf Blitzer has called Biden loquacious;[692] journalist Mark Bowden has said that he is famous for “talking too much”, leaning in close “like an old pal with something urgent to tell you”.[298] He often deviates from prepared remarks[693] and sometimes “puts his foot in his mouth”.[169][694][695] Biden has a reputation for being prone to gaffes[696] and in 2018 called himself “a gaffe machine”.[697][698] The New York Times wrote that Biden’s “weak filters make him capable of blurting out pretty much anything.”[169]

    He has struggled with a stutter most of his life, which he learned to cover up.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Even if he goes full and permanent vegetable, he’s still not Trump. Top priority is stopping Orange Hitler from taking control again, so please for the love of human rights, vote for whoever has the the best shot at beating him - if that’s Biden, cool. If it’s Harris, cool. If it’s a literal ham sandwich, fucking fine - all three are orders of magnitude more qualified to do the job then Trump.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, I’ll vote blue… But get this fucker off the ticket. I’d much rather it be Kamala, or like… Nearly anyone really.

      • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve been trying to be positive about him but he’s really indefensible at this point.

        His hubris is very likely going to fuck things up for everyone.

        Any other candidate will wipe the floor with trump.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think Kamala would be one of the single worst candidates we could put forth, but what do I know? I only worked for the dumpster fire of a DoJ she was partly responsible for.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          hey now, the US has a long and storied history of loving the fuck out of female presidential candidates.

      • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, the question isn’t who Democrats will vote for. It’s who independents will vote for. And there are a lot of independents.

        Relying on the “Never Trump” vote to win this election feels like a terrible risk.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Anyone supposedly independent or undecided at this point is and idgit voter who will either stay home or vote for Trump.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          And if we’re simply relying on “never Trump” then it shouldn’t matter if Biden steps down because the goal is still the same.

        • FatCrab@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The question is who will turn out to vote. The number of “independents” who don’t overwhelmingly vote republican or democratic is vanishingly small. This is found time and time again. Ultimately it’s a question of which electorate turns out and which is demotivated enough not to.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We don’t have democracy anymore.

          First, the SCOTUS ruling did away with that last week, but let’s ignore that for now…

          We have a fascist authoritarian in charge who refuses to even consider stepping down until he dies - certainly he is not going to let the people decide who gets to be the Democratic nominee - vs. someone who will become a dictator for life and do the same, but somehow much, MUCH worse.

          I hope that many people vote Blue No Matter Who… yet I fear that many independents won’t.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s a bit hyperbolic in this context, yet also technically accurate in a surprising number of ways, though mostly I was focusing on how he won’t allow an election to determine who gets to be the Democratic nominee. Also, he has the legal ability to murder his opponents, and is both supporting (in Gaza) even while also decrying (in Ukraine) genocide. Anyway, the point is that he is suppressing opposition (from within his own party, by not allowing a debate about who may replace him), which yes he has the legal ability to do, fwiw. So he is not much of one perhaps, but has some characteristics not entirely dissimilar to one.

              • TheFrirish@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                yeah those observations are fair. Regardless now I’m afraid Trump has sealed his win with this shooting. His voters are going to be mobilised like never before for the election

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Maybe. Though I say we just come together, get his ass in, and then in the first year also get his ass out and let the VP or Speaker step in. Like it or not, changing now IS risky and it is arguable whether it’s the better choice. I’ll go with what the majority chooses because fighting against Trump and the GOP is what’s important.

        Let me repeat: We are in the game where we must do what the Republicans do and come together against a common enemy. So I recommend everyone agree on a candidate then shut up and checkmark that box. We can go back to verbally juxtaposing our positions through digital larping, or whatever it is we do when most of us forget politics exist for four years.

    • Avialle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Going into survival mode forever, where either party can do whatever the frick they want, because they others mustn’t win! Nice system you got there, where it’s like 50\50 every time!

      They present you a Trump and therefore they can even kill your kids, as long as Trump doesn’t win. It’s a scam… both parties are in it. But they divided you all so perfectly fine, you stopped thinking a long time ago.

      Looking forward to your comments, telling me about NO BOth SIdeS!

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not sure why the downvotes. The American duopoly is a scam, you are very right. If there is any hope for change it needs to start lower down the food chain. Support the forward party, get involved in local politics, rally against gerrymandering as a hard as possible.

      • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Its truly an absolute shit system and it keeps itself propped up this way. What will it even take to see blue and red completely removed? Theyre both terrible options for the future of our world, but when November comes around, they’re still on the ballot.

        Until a revamped Constitution is written by people of all genders, colors, faith, wealth, and education, this will never end.

        We can do better than this and it needs to happen now. Its already too late, but we can help slow the damage to our planet if we act quickly.

        Tired of these popularity contests when we’re literally living in a mass extinction.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          The US Constitution is not responsible for the 2-party duopoly. It actually grants us the freedom to have all the political parties we want, and corporate oligarchy has entrenched the current 2 parties. What we really need is corporate money banned from politics, starting with a reversal of Citizens United decision.

          • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            The Constitution was written in part by white men who owned slaves/supported slavery. It does not reflect what America is today.

            The two-party system has held American with a tight grip since the early 1800s. It has done nothing but cause arguments about how much power the federal government should have or not. That argument will continue (and probably get worse) until the USA can embrace having the full support of all of its people. Elected officials are not the answer to this. At the moment, they are people who have time/money to participate in political activities. They generally aren’t aware of what this country is really going through. They only focus on a certain set of issues that they have the passion for. Rarely are they able to properly address other issues, so they end up taking their own party’s stance.

            America was never designed to have parties. In fact, it was said that we should avoid having them at all.

            • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              We also are no longer constrained by horses and written mail. We have significantly changed how communication works and idk why we can’t have a direct democracy nowadays.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Since literally anyone will be Not Trump then can we have someone actually good? That way we’d have “not Trump” and “actually good” both working for us! Win win!

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I think this is a dangerous attitude. He’s made some gaffs recently but overall has not been a terrible person or leader. Supporting the possibility of dropping a candidate this late in the game especially when there are no super star saviors waiting in the wings is the kind of party weakness the GOP would eat up and is a recipe for failure. You don’t have to love him at this point, but it’s too late to start over, just suck it up make a donation to his campaign and vow to become more involved in political change at earlier levels so hopefully we are not in this mess again.

      • Asifall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        He has been a terrible candidate though. If the polling is accurate and trump has a slight lead in popular vote, Biden has less than a 5% chance of winning the election (according to Nate Silver’s models). Unfortunately, this is probably optimistic as polling has overestimated the democratic vote in the last 2 presidential elections including the one that included these same two candidates.

        • HappyStarDiaz@real.lemmy.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nate Silver is terrible and usually terribly wrong, but just step outside the last year and it’s been crystal clear Biden would and will 100% lose the Electoral College to Dump. No amount of Cult Jr telling us to just vote blue no matter who is going to change that. Most Americans don’t know the difference between a row and a column or a watch and a warning, they aren’t thinking critically about Presidential elections.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s so ironic to see the “vote blue no matter who” people argue against replacing Biden when data shows a high probability of him losing. If they suggest we vote blue no matter who then why are they so ardently telling us that it has to be this one guy?

            • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Who will replace him? Michelle Obama doesn’t want to run, Gavin Newsom has full support for Biden, and Kamala Harris is already VP.

              • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’m sure plenty of people would step up if he actually stepped down. What you’re seeing now is people doing damage control to keep from undermining his campaign. It doesn’t mean that they’re actually telling us their true beliefs. Newsom says he fully supports Biden, and if he stepped down, Newsom would fully support whomever took his place.

                I think Harris is just as bad of a candidate as Biden or Clinton. Michelle Obama is an option but I don’t see why we have to treat this like a TV reboot where we keep rehashing the same names and faces that we saw previously. I’d personally love Bernie or AOC, but I know the party leadership hates leftist candidates and will actively work against them, so we’re probably screwed either way just like we were in 2016.

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              “the data” would also suggest that a late replacement could be destructive and have an even Higher probability of losing. More importantly the process to oust Biden is highly unlikely to succeed. Therefore the very act of pushing for these kinds of changes only demonstrates weakness for the GOP and accomplishes nothing but push away any remaining undecided voters toward a party that at least has a clear favorite. I wish people would support the current candidate more aggressively rather than destructively attempt for replacement when doing so is futile.

              • OpenStars@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                While you are at it, you might also wish for people to vote Blue. It’s not going to happen though - independents refuse to tow a particular party line, preferring instead for candidates to earn their votes, and they will watch the world burn, or even turn to Trump to help it, rather than give in. This is what true democracy looks like - sometimes people lose, when enough people on the other side vote to win. We can only control ourselves - e.g. if the Dems were to pick a replacement, there may be a better chance, while otherwise we simply sit back and roll the dice to see whatever happens.

      • VintageTech@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job. The package he brings is a Vice President who could do the job if he were to step down due to health/age concerns to guarantee a female President as his dream come true. She then gets to pick her Vice President which should absolutely be AOC. The opposition has no convincing argument to draw this out in a court as they would need to present their arguments to AOC for rebuttal,

        It’s just so batshit crazy it can’t fail.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Since when has the opposition needed convincing arguments to drag things out? They’ll come up with whatever bullshit they want just to keep stuff from moving forward until they get the ball again.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m voting Joe because he is still the only qualified candidate for the job.

          There’s a couple of hundred million other qualified candidates in the US. If you’re looking for politicial experience, there’s several hundred in Washington alone.

          Dems have totally failed to bring through the next two or three generations of candidates. That the party feels that he’s their only choice is shameful.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s just not flying with the ~100,000 people who are actually going to decide this election. They aren’t going to vote Biden. Polling is making this very clear over the last week or so.

    • ChillPenguin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I will take weekend at Bernie’s in the White House with people who actually understand policies over fascist bat shit crazy any day. Not even a discussion for me.

  • Dearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The aged president with a stutter says something wrong in public again.

    Whatever

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know and then he carried on with the rest of the press conference pretty damn eloquently when it came to unscripted questions.

      Get all the media wants to focus on is a train of thought fuck up.

      I do this shit all the goddamn time, does this mean I am old and decrepit? Senile? No it just means that I fuck up words periodically.

      Unfortunately American voters only want one thing, red or blue, and that’s drama. Which is asinine.

      • Dearth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It sure is. It’s probably gotten worse with age. Stress also triggers stutters. Knowing he’s under intense scrutiny from all sides on every word he speaks in public probably makes it worse. Especially after a lifetime of dealing with pudding brains associating a speech delay with failing mental acuity.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          As you say, a stutter makes getting the words out difficult. It doesn’t make you mix up world leaders.

          • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s literally how a stutter works my man.

            The wrong words come out sometimes even if you know what you were about to say.

            This seems to be the case here as evidenced by the rest of the press conference being smooth as butter.

            But no one seems to care how well things went when you have single phrase fuck up early on. Answering questions effectively and intelligently later on means nothing when you can focus on something that brings in drama points for your average voter to suck on …

            • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              My man, stuttering is not the same thing as anomia or other (related) speech disfluencies. Even so, they are all neurological symptoms and tend to appear amidst neurological decline and dimensia, even if not exclusively.

              It would be one thing if he were simply stuttering his words or misplacing nouns in a sentence, but he has also been forgetting things like the deaths of colleagues and mis-remembering when things occurred. You can pretend those are just silly mistakes that anyone could make, but you shouldn’t act surprised when it causes people to lose confidence in him.

              https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JiafgQEz_Rk

  • sploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The funny thing is that Biden’s had gaffes like this his whole career and could have laughed it off under other circumstances, but with the eyes of the entire world on him watching for him to have another senior moment this is another nail in the coffin.

    • resin85@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Trump at a rally this week: “Mothers will never again be forced to watch their children overdosing & hosp–lee. We will never allow mothers to watch their child hopelessly dying in their arms, screaming, ‘What can I do? Help me God, what can I do?’ We are a nation whose once revered airports are a dirty, crowded mess.”

      Has any media covered that word vomit?

      • Hubi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, because with Trump it has been normalized for years and his base couldn’t care less about these things.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Post a link… I believe you because that certainly sounds like Trump, but a transcript/video would really help it sink in

      • roboto@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Trump’s brain is also absolutely cooked. He just doesn’t look as confused as Biden I think that helps him. Plus that his voters don’t care about facts, I’m guessing they might have actually had some bleach.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Biden has been dogshit in general for his entire career. Not sure why the party pushed so hard for him in 2020.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    He was just asked about his confidence in Kamala to be able to beat Trump, should he be succeeded… and he referred to Trump as his VP and then meandered into some vague talking points.

    • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I thought you were trolling, like in a “you have to double check if I’m bullshitting you now” kind of way. But it’s actually true… and unlike his Putin remark he didn’t seem to even notice he said it.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, I think the people here claiming Biden is as sharp now as 4 years ago, that he’s always made these “gaffes,” must either 1) not have watched him actually make these errors to see how bad they were 2) do not remember how sharp he was comparatively 4 years ago amd/or 3) have never been around someone with cognitive decline and don’t recognize how serious it is.

        And the Putin remark - he caught himself, but still couldn’t remember Zelensky’s name. And he’s merely Zelenksy a few times, he should know him.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Its only been getting worse as this post conference pressser has gone on.

        He has forgotten entirely to respond to parts of a multipart question, meandered into basically ‘I sat down with Golda Meir and Yitsak Rabin and we accomplished peace!’, just keeps repeating things he did (some of which are legitimate accomplishments) that have little to do with other questions asked…

        … “You said your presidency would be a bridge to younger candidates, what happened to that?”

        Rambles about being in the Senate a really long time

        … at one point actually said, outloud, ‘How do I not make this seem self centered?’ before answering a ‘Considering the stakes, do you really think you should run?’ type of question.

        In the time I have been typing this he has basically barked in anger after a short response to a question that was followed by the reporter asking ‘thats all?’.

        He also keeps doing the sort of asshole loud whisper sarcasm voice.

        He is coming off as a sundowning angry old man who doesn’t want his car keys taken away.

        • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Yes and it’s really getting to the point where it undoubtedly impacts his ability to perform without an aide basically at his side at all times. Imagine him telling another world leader something insane and the translator having to jump in correct him. Or worse, how can you be sure something he did mean to say was actually something he meant to say and not just another mistake? That kind of communication failure is very dangerous at the highest level.

          • Aqarius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Man, imagine being the White House translator the next four years. Whoever wins, you’ll be stuck there looking apologetically at the guests going “sorry dude, IDK either”.

          • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes, I spoke with someone earlier today about how communication is VITAL to being president. If he can’t communicate, he can’t do his job.

      • Mobilityfuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean… it was pretty bad but also clearly a slip of tongue as it didn’t confuse the sentence or message - not great though , fuck the DNC

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t even live in the US and even I know why they can’t do that.

      The election money is for Biden or if something happens to him, his running mate. They can’t just reassign the money to some random other person even if logically it would be a good idea.

      This is a stupid law of course, but it’s how it is.

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        My understanding is they could work around the law if they really wanted to, but that puts the campaign at some additional risk. Kamala will probably be the candidate in the end because of this. And she’s great. Ezra Klein really helped me change my mind about her. I’d rather Taylor Swift, but I don’t think she’ll try until 2028 lol.

        • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          if singer becomes fucking president of the west I am going to read hitchhikers backwards
          Kanye West vs Taylor Swift 2028

          It genuinely looks like that no one wants that job. maybe at some point they will put the listing in google ads

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Part of it is that various states require that all candidates already be registered before now, so it’s Biden or bust in those states - they can’t swap him for a different candidate on the ballots there and they can’t officially transfer any pledged electoral votes for him either if he wins.

        There are enough such states to win Trump the election if they go to him essentially by default. And if they all went to Biden despite Biden stepping down then we’d be in a one vote per state election between the top candidates, which leads to a Trump win.